nzsc
Attached are construction documents regarding the removal of a load-bearing wall between the kitchen and the living room in a condominium.

Therefore, I open the floor for your comments / opinions / suggestions regarding this. Everything under the sun is welcome!

K101 shows the plan and section drawing for the existing building.
K102 shows the reinforcement and floor structure for the existing building.
K103 shows the alteration for the opening.
 
  • Floor plan and section drawing of an apartment building renovation, showing existing structures and details for wall opening reinforcement.
  • Blueprint showing reinforcement and flooring plans for an existing building, labeled K102, featuring detailed construction measurements and annotations.
  • Construction plan detailing wall reinforcement for opening between kitchen and living room, including existing wall, structural support, and material specifications.
nzsc
Structural beam analysis diagram with node data shown in a table format. Includes element connections and coordinates for nodes at different points. Structural diagram with element dimensions and loading data, featuring HEA beams and stress analysis details, labeled in Swedish. Structural analysis report showing equilibrium control, load cases, and deformation diagram for a project. Includes data with units and numerical results. Structural analysis report page showing load case details, element specifications, and stability attributes for HEA beams S355N.
 

Best answer

The drawing stamp must be filled in properly. Currently, there is no one responsible for the drawing. In the "specifications," it should also state which standards and norms have been used, as well as which dead loads have been applied in addition to the concrete slab. It would also be good to make a reference to the original drawings that have been used. I also think that an expander should be added either between the column top and the wall or between the beam and the wall, to control the joint laterally. I also consider that the characteristic loads should be presented under "basic load cases" and that these should be combined under "load combinations" in the calculation. I also see no performed serviceability limit check.
 
  • Like
nzsc
  • Laddar…
nzsc
I have of course intentionally blurred the drawing stamp. Wasn't quite sure if it was right to show it openly. Naturally, all the details are filled in there. But it's good that you're attentive and meticulous. Me like! :cool:(y)
Regarding that other thing ...:thinking:... really great input! I actually need to check this with the designer! You have significantly more knowledge and experience in these matters than I do, and therefore it is immensely appreciated that you take the time to present your viewpoints on the whole thing. I thank you so much my friend!

This was exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for when I wrote the post!
 
I almost assumed it was censored;) The other part was mostly about being clear and making it "traceable" for any future interests.
So now it's just for you to find someone to do the work :)(y)
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.