5,655 views ·
22 replies
6k views
22 replies
New veranda roof
Haha. I know how it is.SnickarNicke said:I was just going to replace the roof.... :S
It's not just about digging, I need to tear down the decking too, but maybe that's what it takes. I'll try to check a bit more once I've torn down the roof so I can see how it looks underneath.
I thought it would be a weekend's work, but it never is... same with "I'm just going to have a beer.." d^_^b
Now the roof and the upper part of both walls are down. I also tore down part of the outer wall and damn, it was poorly constructed.
There are three posts in the outer part, but the "bärlina" doesn't rest on the posts. There is an angle on each side of the posts (with three screws) that the bärlina rests on. Whoever did this before can't have known much about how a stable solution should be. It's a wonder that the angle has held while the "stolarna" has collapsed (when the snow came).
There are three posts in the outer part, but the "bärlina" doesn't rest on the posts. There is an angle on each side of the posts (with three screws) that the bärlina rests on. Whoever did this before can't have known much about how a stable solution should be. It's a wonder that the angle has held while the "stolarna" has collapsed (when the snow came).
Really sounds like that veranda was a real botched job. I agree with you, they can't have known much about building, they could have at least used beam shoes instead of angle brackets. The best thing, of course, is to place the bearer on the posts.
Then you find out that there is load-bearing capacity in an angle.:wow:SnickarNicke said:Now the roof and the upper part of both walls are down. I also tore down part of the outer wall and damn, it was poorly constructed.
There are three posts in the outer part, but the "beam" does not rest on the posts. There is an angle bracket on each side of the posts (with three screws) that the beam rests on. Whoever did this previously cannot have known much about how a stable solution should be. It's a wonder that the angle bracket has held while the "stools" have crashed (when the snow came).
I felt the posts a bit and they seem to be secure, so I will reuse them. Since the posts didn't bend with all that snow, I believe they will hold in the future as well. There are 3 pieces 95x95 at 240cm.
I plan to notch the posts for the support beam so that it sits in the post; this will make it sturdy.
The support beam on the wall will get joist hangers, and I believe the construction will be stable enough. The deck isn't very large, so I don't need to over-engineer it.
Now it will also be pressure-treated wood, which it wasn't before.
I plan to notch the posts for the support beam so that it sits in the post; this will make it sturdy.
The support beam on the wall will get joist hangers, and I believe the construction will be stable enough. The deck isn't very large, so I don't need to over-engineer it.
Now it will also be pressure-treated wood, which it wasn't before.
Yes, more than 2" 3 at least. :xbarajag said:
It should be 280... And it's not the pole I'm worried about, it's how it's positioned down there... I have no idea, but since it withstood the snow it should be positioned as it should.
Here are some pictures of how it looked before I tore it down.
Temporary support until snickarNicke has time

A bit thin perhaps

Load-bearing?

This is how good it looked when I removed an overliggare
It was so rotten that all the nails remained :O

Temporary support until snickarNicke has time

A bit thin perhaps

Load-bearing?

This is how good it looked when I removed an overliggare
It was so rotten that all the nails remained :O

Click here to reply