Hello good people. Yet another "Is this wall load-bearing" thread.

I have a wall running through the middle of the house, marked in red in the pictures. Despite it going through the house, I don't think it's load-bearing, based on what I've seen in the attic.

The studs are 4x4 cm wide.

What do you think?

Wooden studs in a partially demolished wall, marked with red lines, with exposed wiring and wallpaper in a room.
Interior view of a partially deconstructed wall with exposed studs marked in red. Two wooden doors are visible in the background.
A wooden attic with a narrow walkway, showing a red line marked on the floorboards to indicate a wall position; exposed beams are visible.
Attic view with wooden beams and a red-marked line on the floor indicating a wall's position. The wall is questioned for being load-bearing.
Floor plan showing a potentially non-load-bearing wall marked in red, running through the middle of a house, with rooms labeled and measurements in meters.
 
Such thin studs are not load-bearing
 
  • Like
d0391m0 and 1 other
  • Laddar…
The roof trusses appear to be common free-spanning trusses, which do not require any supporting wall underneath.
 
  • Like
d0391m0
  • Laddar…
Matti_75 Matti_75 said:
Such thin studs are not load-bearing
Ok. Thanks for the answer.

Is there any "rule of thumb" for how thick they should be?
 
From 45x70, they can be load-bearing, but most commonly it's 45x95 and upwards as it's the buckling length that becomes dimensioning.
 
  • Like
Huddingebo
  • Laddar…
The studs disappeared a few hours ago and so far nothing has collapsed.

Have also walked a little in the attic.

Can we breathe easy or is there a risk that issues with load-bearing will come later?

Also noted this 'warning' (written on the stud) when I removed a bit more drywall as the studs disappeared. But that can't have anything to do with load-bearing, right?
 
  • Wooden beams with metal brackets and nails exposed after removing drywall, showing a handwritten note on the beam, possibly indicating a warning.
They do not support the roof. Whether they have a load-bearing function for the rest of the house, I leave unsaid.

If you are not very sure of your case, you should avoid tearing down interior walls as much as possible. The walls may serve other functions than handling loads from above, which might be the easiest to assess yourself.
 
  • Like
Huddingebo and 1 other
  • Laddar…
L Liljeros said:
They don't support the outer roof. As to whether they have a supporting function for the rest of the house, I won't say.

Unless you are very sure of yourself, you should avoid tearing down interior walls as much as possible. The walls can serve other functions besides handling loads from above, which is perhaps the easiest to assess yourself.
Thanks for the response!

There are some electrical wires in the walls, but nothing unusual. What other important functions could the wall have?
Maybe I'm just worrying because of the 'warning' 😅..
 
D d0391m0 said:
Thanks for the reply!

There has been some electricity in the walls but nothing unusual. What other important functions could the wall have?
Maybe I'm just worrying because of the 'warning' 😅..
Interior walls can, for instance, serve the function of stabilizing the house against wind loads.
 
  • Like
Hybro and 2 others
  • Laddar…
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.