Ok. Is there any reason to build with 25cm blocks or is 20cm sufficient?

Mmm I think that white plaster looks better with the rest that is plastered, but as mentioned, the level of the wall on the new building and on the adjacent building to the right will not be the same, so maybe it would look better to change it up with faluröda cladding boards instead..?
 
What I'm thinking about is if a door swings open because of the wind, it can result in considerable forces twisting in the frame, especially if the door cannot open 180° without the façade/door hole or trim stopping it earlier.

I don't think that differences in the level of walls matter that much.
 
Now I am sitting and thinking about lecawalls 19cm with a 45x95 top plate. On this come the standing 45x220 roof beams.

How do I suitably cover the eaves?

I have seen buildings where the roof beam is bricked in, how is that done?

Can you place the 45x95 top plate edge to edge with the inside of the lecablocks and then brick with a 9cm lecablock outside?
 
Not planning to install any ceiling. How do you manage ventilation? I was thinking about 4 external air vents in the walls...
 
On many old stables and barns that are built with masonry, the eaves and gables are clad with wood paneling (overlap paneling). Often the long walls are slightly elevated to provide more volume in the hayloft, but it is only the ground floor that is built with masonry.

If it's just the eaves/beams that need to be clad, then a horizontal batten/board can be used between the roof beams.

It's probably fine to embed them as well, but then one typically wouldn't use a wall plate...

It should be possible to create a hybrid solution that you were considering as well. (I.e., 10 cm masonry and 10 cm wall plate.)
 
If you completely enclose and do not use a top plate, how are the beams then attached?
 
Assuming they are just laying loose, i.e. not nailed down. (But maybe this only works on older houses where the beams are significantly thicker and heavier?)
Then the flooring should be properly joined on the inside so that it forms a whole "cake", which is both stable and heavy and doesn't move easily. If trusses are attached, there will be forces in different directions, including lifting that must be managed. Possibly, one could use brackets/bands on the inside of the wall to nail/screw the beams to the wall.
 
Seems like 10cm hammarband and 10cm wall will be easier..?
 
I was planning on using 2 carrier beams with posts. Can I splice the 45x220 beams on the carrier beams, or is it really worth the extra cost to buy finger-jointed 45x220 in 9m lengths?
 
My first thought was to have two support beams with posts under each support beam consisting of 2 glued 45x220 for increased support.

Then I thought about using roof beams 3.6m long in 45x220 cc 60 overlapped with through screws?
Or is it better to splice end to end over the support beam with nail plate?

However, that means splicing on both support beams regardless.

Are finger-jointed 9m lengths better?
 
No one with opinions..?
 
Pictures say more than a thousand words :)

3D model of a garage layout showing walls, a red and black tool cabinet, and dimensions in SketchUp Pro interface.
A 3D SketchUp model of a garage with detailed dimensions, an outlined structure, and a parked red and black trailer inside.
 
Overlap splicing is better from a load-bearing perspective. Whether it is necessary for your loads here, I do not know, but it always feels better to put in a little extra effort.

See no need to buy finger-jointed.
 
What is the standard for overlap carving usually?

3.60 timber lengths should be enough according to the picture, as the span is about 2.90, right?
 
Don't know what the standard is or if there even is one. It's probably like usual that it depends...

3.6 m gives a good overlap length.
 
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.