I am considering removing an inner wall, but since one of the outer walls is lower than the other, I'm confused about how the roof truss looks and if the wall might be load-bearing.

I haven't yet removed the ceiling or crawled up to the attic to take a closer look. The attic is low, with a maximum of 50 cm between the insulation and the roof decking. The house is narrow, with exterior measurements of 600 cm. So, I have drawn up a sketch of how I think it might look. I've of course looked up into the attic via the hatch and seen the roof truss from there... but it's hard to say how the collar tie goes.

What do you think?
 
  • Drawing of a house structure with labeled elements: green is ceiling, red is roof truss, black is interior wall, blue is exterior wall.
BirgitS
When was the house built?
Do you have any construction drawings or similar?
The sectional drawing usually shows which are the load-bearing interior walls.
 
BirgitS BirgitS said:
When was the house built?
Do you have any construction drawings or similar?
In the sectional drawing, it usually shows what are load-bearing interior walls.
The house was built in the 60s but was expanded in the 70s.
The building plan does state that there are self-supporting trusses... but I'm still confused haha :) And when I look at the drawing, I don't really think it matches reality. At least not on the sectional drawing for the basement; it shows an upper floor that looks symmetrical, or?
 
  • Architectural drawings showing house elevations, section views, and proposed extensions for a 1960s and 1970s expansion, questioning the structural plans.
  • Blueprint of house extension plan showing rooms labeled "Kök," "Sov," "Allrum," and "Stuga" with proposed layout changes.
A photo of how it looks today
....and don't be too influenced by what looks like a beam. It can be....but very simply built box with particleboard and a few planks/regel.
 
  • View of an interior space with wooden ceiling, open doorways, and a coat rack with hanging items. Draft construction materials visible through a partially open door.
Where you have drawn a green sloped ceiling, how tall is the exterior wall? That's the part that doesn't quite match your drawings.
 
Dowser4711 Dowser4711 said:
Where you have drawn a green inner ceiling with a sloping roof, how high is the outer wall?
That's the part that doesn't quite match your drawings.
When I stand by the low wall, the standing height is a maximum of 190cm. Normal standing height is otherwise 230cm.
 
BirgitS
In the drawing, it doesn't appear to be truss rafters. If you rely on the sectional drawing, there are no load-bearing interior walls. But in the drawing, it doesn't look like you've drawn the rafters either.

In the sectional drawing with the basement, I think there is a different distance between the outer sides and the nearest vertical stud for the attic. Unlike the upper sectional drawing.
 
BirgitS BirgitS said:
In the drawing, it does not appear to be truss rafters. If we believe the sectional drawing, there are no load-bearing interior walls. But in the drawing, it also does not look like you have drawn the rafters.

In the sectional drawing with the basement, I do think that the distance between the outer sides and the nearest standing rule for the attic is different compared to the upper sectional drawing.
Now I see a mistake I also made on the drawing I sketched. The treads are not symmetrically placed. See the attached photo showing the right and left sides.
 
  • Asymmetrical wooden beams in attic space showing construction error on right side.
  • Attic view with visible asymmetrical rafters on the left and right sides, highlighting design error in their placement.
  • Scan of a Swedish construction document with specifications for intermediate floors, roof truss, outer roof, and inner roof, related to a building permit application.
Well, the drawing you have does not match reality.
And usually, reality wins...

Either there has been a renovation after the building permit drawing, or perhaps more likely, they have built in a different way than it was drawn.

Based on how it seems to look in reality, it doesn't feel unreasonable that it is a load-bearing wall, but to be really sure, you would need to bring in a structural engineer who can check and calculate what you have before making any major changes in those parts of the construction.

Btw, are the dark parts of the roof moisture? I see on the paper that you've had some leakage, but not much and unclear when.
 
  • Like
BirgitS
  • Laddar…
BirgitS
That might be trusses but could also be some sort of reinforcement to allow the roof to handle being extended.

Are there any descriptions in the building permit documents where you can find more about the trusses?
 
BirgitS BirgitS said:
Those might be truss rafters but could also be some sort of reinforcement to allow the roof to be extended.

Are there any descriptions in the building permit documents where you can find more about the rafters?
No, unfortunately, I can't find any more information about the rafters. The only thing I have found about the rafters is the draft I posted above, i.e. that they should be free-spanning truss
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.