Hello,

I am considering buying a house from 1924 with an extension from 1999.

The extension has a wooden frame and the exterior walls are externally insulated with mineral wool insulation. Outside there is a reinforced render.

I have seen an inspection report from 2002 when the house was last sold. The report states that the execution of the window and threshold flashings in the extension is done in a non-approved way, allowing water to penetrate the wall under the windows and potentially damage the underlying wooden framework. Additionally, the base sheet in the extension does not cover the entire width of the sill, and there is also a warning that this might be a moisture issue.

The main building (render on brick) seems to be in quite good condition; it's mostly the extension that worries me.
Having read so much about moisture problems with render on foam insulation, could the same apply to render on mineral wool insulation? Does anyone have an opinion on whether the construction with a wooden frame, mineral wool insulation, and render combined with the construction errors mentioned in the inspection report makes it likely that I will have moisture problems in the extension?

I really like the house and am willing to make some repairs (e.g., sealing window flashings, etc.) but I am not prepared to reconstruct the facade of the extension.
 
Milkshaken
Hello, welcome to byggahus....

2 things that strike me are.
1: Why sell the house after less than 4 years?? (Moisture, mold problems)
2: Surely you don't buy a house just by looking at an old inspection report??
You can save and probably haggle a lot if you bring in an inspector. It costs between 6-8,000 but you should see it as if you don't buy the house, you probably save a hell of a lot of money...
 
Six years, I guess. There's nothing strange about that. There are those who move after one year.
 
teani said:
Hello,

I am considering buying a house from 1924 with an extension from 1999.

The extension has a wooden framework and the exterior walls are insulated with stone wool insulation. Outside, there is reinforced plaster.

I have seen an inspection report from 2002 when the house was last sold. The report indicates that the execution of the window and threshold flashings in the extension is done in a non-approved manner, allowing water to penetrate the wall under the windows and potentially damage the underlying wooden framework. Additionally, the base paper in the extension does not cover the entire width of the sill, and there is also a warning about this being a potential moisture issue.

The main building (plaster on brick) seems to be in quite good condition, it is mostly the extension that worries me.
One reads so much about moisture problems with plaster on cellpats, can the same apply to plaster on stone wool insulation? Does anyone have an opinion on whether the construction with a wooden framework, stone wool insulation, and plaster combined with the construction errors shown in the inspection report makes it likely that I will have moisture problems in the extension?

I really like the house and could imagine doing some repairs (e.g., sealing the window flashings etc.) but I am not prepared to reconstruct the facade of the extension.
If it is reinforced thick plaster on mineral wool, it is considered a safe and proven construction.
You need to address the mistakes at the windows, etc.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.