I have a Myresjöhus from the 1940s.

The house was originally rendered with lime plaster on reed mats and underneath it standing wood planks.

In 1978, the previous owner re-plastered the house with noble splash plaster KC-plaster. As far as I know, this was not done entirely correctly, but it was like that in the 1970s.

When I have to re-plaster the house, should I then knock down all the splash plaster? and then use lime plaster. Or can I continue plastering with new splash plaster (KC-plaster)?

Is there anyone who has had the same problem?
 
Hi Harrys,

Thank you for your response. My conclusion is to first repair the plaster with lime plaster and then with the KC-splash plaster. I have a manual plastering machine for the splash plaster (Optiroc Serpo 201).

Regarding a complete replastering of the entire property, do you have an idea of what it would cost to hire a professional to switch to lime plaster? The lime plaster is applied on reed mats against planks. If you also have information on what a replastering with KC plaster would cost, I would appreciate it.

The plastering area is about 300 square meters.
 
If the KCputsen remains, there's no reason to remove it, right? It becomes very expensive if everything has to come down.

If you're not a historic preservation fanatic, you can just repair what's bad?!
 
harrys said:
I agree, you can only repair. But the question is how sustainable it becomes with KC plaster on lime plaster in the long run??? You don't have to be a building conservation fanatic to want the house whole and nice.
No, indeed. But at the same time, there is a veeeery big cost difference between repairing and redoing. If most of the plaster is still there after 30+ years, it will probably stay in the future too.

KC plaster can actually be so hard that it is loose but still stays! :)
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.