Hello!

I am planning to tear down my wall and would need your help on what you think. The wall is to be removed between the kitchen and living room, see image "floor plan."
I don't think it is load-bearing because:
- The wall is 11 cm thick
- The wall's content is some form of lightweight concrete/plaster - See image
- The wall has a thicker column at the end. see shaded area in the image (circle in the image "floor plan")
- 80% of the association has removed the wall (probably not load-bearing if so many have done it) - see images "suggestions"

What do you think? Extremely grateful for any replies. I have looked into getting a certification but it costs about 7,000 which is a lot of money since I really believe it's not load-bearing.

Happy Easter!
 
  • Interior view of a living room and kitchen area with an open doorway, grey walls, and wooden furniture.
  • Living area with a navy sofa, wooden chair, and a view into a kitchen. A wall with floral wallpaper and a chandelier is seen in the background.
  • Blueprint showing floor plans of two multi-apartment layouts with rooms labeled, highlighting walls and load-bearing pillars for renovation guidance.
  • Architectural floor plan showing wall layouts and structural details for a building, used in a discussion about removing a non-load-bearing wall.
  • Blueprint of an apartment layout showing structural details and wall dimensions, used to determine if a wall between the kitchen and living room is load-bearing.
  • Hole in a blue wall with white dust on the floor, showing material inside the wall, possibly for consideration in a home renovation project.
  • Floor plan showing a wall marked for removal between kitchen and living room, with red circles and rectangles indicating areas of interest.
As you suspected, the wall between the kitchen and living room is not load-bearing. On top of the columns is a steel beam supporting the concrete slab. This was easy to determine with the help of the detailed drawings you attached. However, one should avoid drawing too many conclusions about load-bearing based solely on wall thickness. It requires quite extensive knowledge to understand it in context. An 11 cm wall thickness could mean a 3-inch plank wall with plaster on both sides. In a small house from the same period, load-bearing walls look that way.

I also lived in Gårda, although it was quite a long time ago. Södra Kustbanegatan.
 
  • Like
Kuytan and 2 others
  • Laddar…
BIG thanks for the explanation.
Out of curiosity, on which picture and where on the drawing can one see the stålbalken? :)
Okay, I have drilled through the entire wall and there is no other material than plaster/light concrete.

how fun!! super nice area!

have a nice evening!
 
On the drawing called "image 3", floor plan G, there is a dashed line labeled 703-INP 20. INP is an older type of steel beam profile. INP 20 is 200 mm high and 90 mm wide. From a rigidity perspective, it lies between HEA 160 and HEA 180, which are more modern profiles. It requires some experience in reading drawings to see this.
 
  • Like
Kuytan
  • Laddar…
Thanks! We tried to tear it down, but it was apparently some kind of concrete stone instead of plaster/light concrete. We'll have to find a carpenter/concreter who has the right tools instead :D

//Johan
 
No, I didn't believe in lättbetong. It didn't match the construction year. Brick or concrete hollow blocks or possibly concrete blocks are quite likely. Plus planking + plaster, but that wasn't it.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.