4,851 views ·
10 replies
5k views
10 replies
Fastening of carriage components
Member
· Blekinge
· 10 117 posts
The best option is probably real vangstycken (note the spelling), i.e., slanted beams with cut-out stair wedges. It is certainly possible to make your solution work, but it is inferior in terms of utilizing the material's strength and not as elegant.
The problem with pre-manufactured vangstycken is that they don't work with the height difference I have. They're not particularly pretty, but they won't be visible once the decking is in place.J justusandersson said:
Member
· Blekinge
· 10 117 posts
Prefabricated ones probably won't do. Make them yourself. Start with the stair formula, 2h+d=60-63. Double the riser height plus the tread depth should be 60 to 63 expressed in cm.
41cm total height with two steps gives 20.5cm per step
2h+d=60 to 63cm
2*20.5+d=60 to 63 cm indicates that the step depth should be 19 to 22cm.
41cm total height with three steps gives ~13.5cm per step
2h+d=60 to 63cm
2*13.5+d=60 to 63 cm indicates that the step depth should be 33 to 36cm.
With only one or two steps, I think you can be a bit more flexible. How wide should the stairs be? I would probably make a "sitting stair" along the entire deck and make it deeper, about 3-5 decking boards deep, and furnish it with some cushions. Stairs are underrated for sitting.
The overhang at the back appears to be a maximum of 20 cm, so all the lumber used to accommodate the height difference will suffice.
2h+d=60 to 63cm
2*20.5+d=60 to 63 cm indicates that the step depth should be 19 to 22cm.
41cm total height with three steps gives ~13.5cm per step
2h+d=60 to 63cm
2*13.5+d=60 to 63 cm indicates that the step depth should be 33 to 36cm.
With only one or two steps, I think you can be a bit more flexible. How wide should the stairs be? I would probably make a "sitting stair" along the entire deck and make it deeper, about 3-5 decking boards deep, and furnish it with some cushions. Stairs are underrated for sitting.
The overhang at the back appears to be a maximum of 20 cm, so all the lumber used to accommodate the height difference will suffice.
The stairs will be long, 9.6m. As it is made now, there are two steps, 350mm deep with a height of 138mm.T toolman77 said:41cm total height with two steps gives 20.5cm per step 2h+d=60 to 63cm 2*20.5+d=60 to 63cm means the step depth should be 19 to 22cm.
41cm total height with three steps gives ~13.5cm per step 2h+d=60 to 63cm 2*13.5+d=60 to 63cm means the step depth should be 33 to 36cm.
With just one or two steps I think you can take some liberties. How wide should the stairs be? I would probably make a "sit stair" along the entire deck and make it deeper about 3-5 patio boards in depth and furnish with some cushions. Stairs are underrated comfortable to sit in.
The overhang in the back looks to be a maximum of 20cm so all the lumber taking up the height difference will be sufficient
The distance between the beam and the posts is 24cm. How would you do the attachment in the best way?
A step is usually between 15-18cm in height. The seat height can be anything between 40-70cm. Calculate the total height of the stairs and divide by the desired number of steps, then calculate an average for the steps and place the seat height at a suitable spot that aligns with the stairs.
You can do it in many ways, so this is just an example.
You can do it in many ways, so this is just an example.
If it should align with the step, the bench will only be 27.6cm high, which seems quite low?M Marcusskold said:A step is usually between 15-18cm in height. The seat height can be anything between 40-70cm. Calculate the total height of the staircase and divide by the desired number of steps, then calculate an average for the steps and place the seat height at a suitable spot that aligns with the staircase.
You can do it in many ways, so this is just an example
Member
· Blekinge
· 10 117 posts
An appropriate seat height is around 50 cm. 45x95 for the lower part of the vangstycket might be suitable with the lengths that are relevant.
Click here to reply


