Today, I have mansard trusses and plan to build an extension on the upper floor at an angle in the middle. Supporting the trusses would incur high costs and significant intervention, so I plan to leave them largely intact. However, I would like to cut down the eaves according to the dashed line (the image is not to scale with my truss, just the principle) and plan to reinforce by screw-gluing plywood on both sides according to the orange marking.
Illustration of a roof truss modification plan with a dotted line indicating where the eaves would be cut and an orange-marked area showing where reinforcement is planned.

The truss rests on the outer wall between the eave and post in principle according to the arrow.

Could this work? I assume no truss manufacturer would want to calculate something like this as it no longer consists of triangles...
 
You'll probably need a rule between the plywood but I can't imagine it wouldn't work.
 
M
Only my load calculation brain that raises a red flag as the ridge beam takes a large tensile load from the sagging of the roof and the described modification would mean a great risk of buckling at both the upper and lower fastenings of the plywood board. A load which in the original design is absorbed by the lower part of the rafter without stressing a fastening point, but which now is distributed over two fastening points.

In any case, I'm just guessing that it's a problem, but it doesn't have to be; I would probably ask a constructor.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.