Building a greenhouse (orangery) in wood 3.5m x 7.4m with a ridge beam. It will resemble the one in the picture - *see my drawing. I'd like it to have the same look as the photograph describes, so I planned to use the glulam that seems right: 66x315. The first time I used Moelven and Byggbeskrivningar dimensioning program, 66x315 came up, and I was happy - aesthetically, it seems to fit and look the best.

BUT, I didn't check the deflection tables well. Now I wonder what is meant by 29mm (L/255) deflection? If it means 3cm deflection, it sounds a bit much - I don't have a sliding door and the glass is attached on this stretch with the short side cc 50, so it's easy to pick up a few degrees of angle - but seriously, is it crazily much to pick up?
 
Architectural diagram of a roof with specifications: ridge beams and rafters, dimensions, angles, and construction notes, highlighting a two-pillar structure. Chart displaying timber beam specifications, including deformation, utilization rate, bearing length, and reaction force for GL28cs and GL30c beams.
 
Here you can see the glulam beam in a similar large greenhouse. Does look like it might be larger than 66mm here?

A large, white greenhouse with a visible glulam beam surrounded by lush greenery; beam appears larger than 66mm. Large greenhouse interior with laminated wooden beam structure, featuring a dining setup surrounded by plants, suggesting beams larger than 66mm.
 
Since a width of 140mm is aesthetically excluded, it seems like it's between 66x315 which has 29mm deflection or something that creates significantly less deflection, and in that case, 90x405 is the closest option.
 
Have now decided that 29mm deflection is not okay. Still waiting for a quote on the overbent beam. Otherwise, it will be 90x405.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.