Have been living for half a year in a new house and already feel it's starting to look worn out. Compared to my previous house built in '87, and if you ignore that it's almost 20 years old, it feels more solid. I assume it may also depend on which home builder constructs the house.

-The parquet is cracking.
-Faucets replaced in the bathrooms
- Doors are warped
- Paint chips quickly on doors, etc.
-Much feels fragile.

But was it better before?
The home builder can certainly save money by choosing cheaper materials, but what should one really accept?
 
A large part is probably the quality of the material you are buying.
 
Milkshaken
In these cases you list, it's the quality that matters, if you buy a cheaper brand on an item to keep the construction cost down, it will definitely come back after a while..... Quality costs like,,,,, (That's why I drive a LEXUS as a car) (Use a Kirby machine for maintenance in house and car) :)
 
It was certainly possible to get hold of junk quality materials in the past as well, but such junk quality things don't last as long, so after a while, only the quality stuff that has survived from a certain era remains, while all the junk has perished, which then gives the impression that everything from that era was of high quality. There were shoddy constructions 100 years ago as well, but they are no longer around.

It is perfectly possible to get hold of high-quality timber and high-quality carpenters today too, but quality costs.
 
Ksund said:
It was certainly possible to get hold of poor-quality items in the past too, but those of poor quality don't last as long, so after a while, only the quality items survive from a certain era, while all the junk perishes, which then gives the impression that everything from that era was of high quality. There were shoddy constructions 100 years ago too, but they are no longer around.

It's perfectly possible to get high-quality wood and craftsmen today too, but quality costs.
That could certainly be the case. It just feels almost like you can't let the kids play in their rooms because everything feels fragile.
They played in their old rooms and barely left a mark.
 
fubar said:
I guess that could be the case. It just almost feels like you can't let the kids play in their rooms because everything feels fragile.
They played in their old rooms and hardly left a mark.
Then it's probably the case that you had more durable materials in your old place...

What kind of things do you have now that feel fragile and get worn out, if I may ask?
 
Ksund said:
Then it is probably the case that you had more durable materials in your old home...

What are the things you have now that feel fragile and worn, if I may ask?
We had parquet in the old house; there were scratches and some marks. In the new house, it's a parquet that can't be sanded, it has a hard core and is supposed to be very good. According to the seller. But that's what makes it fragile. If something is dropped on it, pieces of the wood surface come off. On a softer parquet, a dent would form and the wood would rise after a while, and the mark wouldn't be so noticeable. You don't think about such marks.

In the kitchen, we need to replace the entire floor, after six months. We had a wooden floor in the previous house too, and there were no problems. And it wasn't a particularly expensive type or anything.

The interior doors are starting to lose paint in some places, which the old ones didn't. The ones in the previous house feel like they have a harder surface.

Are there different hardnesses of plasterboard? - I've gotten several marks from toys. That didn't happen in the previous house.

So I agree, there were more durable materials in the old house. Otherwise, it's a nice house and we like it, but it feels like it's quickly becoming worn.

A lot is standard from the house supplier, but standard doesn't mean it should be bad, right?
The options, for me, are to choose a few more features and gadgets, not that you should be forced to choose a bunch of things to get a livable house.
 
fubar said:
We had parquet in the old house, sure there were scratches and some marks. In the new house, it's a parquet that can't be sanded, it has a hard core and is supposed to be very good. According to the seller.
But that's what makes it fragile. If something is dropped on it, pieces of the wood surface come off. On a softer parquet, there would be a dent and the wood would rise after a while and the mark wouldn't be so noticeable. You don't really notice those kinds of marks.
That sounds bad, is it Kährs Linnea 7 mm you have? Or a similar product from another supplier? Interested to hear what's not good...

A lot is standard from the house supplier, but standard doesn't mean it should be bad, right?
Options, for me, mean choosing a few more features and gadgets, not having to choose a lot of things to get a house that is livable.
Unfortunately, it seems that house suppliers have noticed that people request quotes and then choose the cheapest option without checking the materials closely, so they generally use fairly cheap materials in the standard version.
 
It sounds bad, do you have Kährs Linnea 7 mm? Or a similar product from another supplier? Interesting to hear what's wrong...
I think it's called "residence" or something similar, probably from golvabia and is 7mm thick. It's anyway hjältevads standard floor.

Anyone know what happened when the floor goes in waves? -Each board is higher in the middle and slopes towards the edges, if you run your hand or foot over it, it's clear that it's not flat and there's a void underneath. It looks like this on a couple of square meters in one corner of the living room.
 
fubar said:
Anyone know what's happening when the floor is wavy? - each board is higher in the middle and slopes towards the edges, when you run your hand or foot, it's clear that it's not flat and that there's empty space underneath. It looks like this on a few square meters in one corner of the living room.
Could it be that the underside has dried/shrunk more than the top? The top is lacquered and unaffected by humidity and doesn't move ... or maybe it expands due to heat? Do you have a lot of sunlight in the affected corner? Just guessing...
gaia
 
fubar said:
I think it's called "residence" or something similar, probably from golvabia and it's 7mm thick. Anyway, it's the standard floor for hjältevad.

Does anyone know what has happened when the floor goes wavy? -each board is higher in the middle and slopes towards the edges, if you run your hand or foot over it, you can clearly feel it's not flat and that there's a hollow underneath. It looks like this over a couple of square meters in one corner of the living room.
Are there gaps between the laminate boards as well? It rained onto our new 7mm parquet, it swelled and when it dried, the floor remained wavy and there were gaps in the joints...

/Abbe
 
Are there gaps between the lamella boards as well? It rained on our new 7mm parquet, it swelled and when it dried, the floor remained wavy and there were gaps in the joints...
There are gaps between the boards, but not in the boards. (Clear enough? :-))
Did you need to replace the floor?
or maybe it expands from the heat? Do you have a lot of sunlight in the affected corner? just guesses...
There is a window about a meter from the corner, the sun usually comes further into the room.
 
We are having problems with the recidencegolv as well. Standard in the house, the kitchen floor looks like a demolition house and there are problems with cracks in other rooms. Can we replace the floor with a better one from the house manufacturer?
 
From Golvabia:
Other advantages
- Low construction height - only 7 mm - requires few adjustments to other furnishings.
- Renovatable through overcoating.
- 10-year wear warranty on lacquered finish.
Should the bottom line be interpreted as the floor being available in two versions - one lacquered and one unlacquered?
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.