Magnus E K
Homeowner
· Östergötland
· 4 612 posts
Magnus E K
Homeowner
- Östergötland
- 4,612 posts
Isn't it framework trusses that require support from a heart wall beneath them? If that wall is removed, the trusses would need to be completely rebuilt into a truss system. You would need to leave a number of posts with a beam above them.
You are both right and wrong. But more generally, one can say that truss rafters, in normal lumber dimensions, do require support. At least if the span exceeds 6 meters. But that's because the actual point of a truss rafter is really to be able to use the attic space and thus load the floor significantly. But when there is no floor or floor joists, it becomes almost impossible to use the attic. Without a load on the attic, no support is needed underneath.Magnus E K said:
Yes, that's what I initially thought too, placing a steel/glulam beam doesn't matter much in a garage but it would have been nice to avoid it.Magnus E K said:
I now see that the rafters are spliced on the partition wall. What could be the dimension of glulam if you are to place it underneath for support? The wall is 11 meters but 5.5-6 meters of it will be removed.A AG A said:You are both right and wrong. But more generally, one can say that truss rafters, in normal timber dimensions, require support. At least if the span exceeds 6 meters. But that is because the whole point of a truss rafter is really to be able to use the attic and thereby load the floor substantially. But if there is no floor, or intermediate joists, it's almost impossible to use the attic. Without load in the attic, no support is needed underneath.
Calm down now, the support beams transfer loads from the roof down to the underarm which is supported by the wall. If the support is to be removed, either the wall must be replaced with a beam or the trusses must be modified with a framework.A AG A said:You are both right and wrong. But more generally, you can say that trusses, in normal timber dimensions, require support. At least if the span exceeds 6 meters. But that's because the main point of a truss is really to be able to use the attic, and thus load the floor properly. But since there is no floor or intermediate joists, it becomes almost impossible to use the attic. Without load on the attic, no support is needed underneath.
Best answer
U
Utsliten och utdömd
Building conservationist
· 2 796 posts
Utsliten och utdömd
Building conservationist
- 2,796 posts
You place the beam above the roof trusses and attach them in the displacement. Then you can embed proper posts in the gable walls and won't need to consider the ceiling height when sizing the glulam beam.niclas47 said:
You are speaking with a structural engineer, and I am calm. As I've said, it's both right and wrong. For shorter spans, it's fine without support. Especially when the attic floor is not to be loaded.Lulaua said:
I saw that from the very beginning. BUT, they are spliced according to "the art's all rules," and therefore hold just as well as unspliced.niclas47 said:
Click here to reply



