1 16386 said:
The "vertical raw paneling" is therefore not nearly 5 cm thick?
No, it's about 17mm. The picture is from where I removed a door in the wall. The nail you see in the stud is for a horizontal stud. There are compartments roughly 60cm wide that are completely empty. Close-up of a wooden wall frame with an exposed screw where a door was removed, showing an empty 60cm space between beams.
 
Interesting. You should probably wait for a knowledgeable forum member, like Justus, to answer.
 
On the upper floor, there are no load-bearing partition walls at all because you have truss roof beams. Plank walls are not normally found in houses built in 1954. There is much that seems to deviate from the norm. The type of wall you just described is usually only found in garden sheds and similar structures. So, all drawings on the table before we continue the discussion.
 
J justusandersson said:
On the upper floor, there are no load-bearing partition walls at all because you have truss rafters. Plank walls are not usually found in houses built in 1954. Many things seem to deviate from the norm. The type of wall you just described is usually only found in summer cottages and the like. So, all drawings on the table before we continue the discussion.
J justusandersson said:
On the upper floor, there are no load-bearing partition walls at all because you have truss rafters. Plank walls are not usually found in houses built in 1954. Many things seem to deviate from the norm. The type of wall you just described is usually only found in summer cottages and the like. So, all drawings on the table before we continue the discussion.
The technical description is just above, and besides the section, there are facade drawings and this one. It is the red wall I want to open up, and it is built as I described and as you can see in the close-up I photographed in an old door opening. Blueprint showing a two-story house with detailed floor plans; a red line marks the wall in question to be opened, as referenced in the discussion post.
 
If it really is as the section drawing shows that the house has W-trusses (i.e., frameworks), then no interior walls on the upper floor are load-bearing.
 
J justusandersson said:
If it truly is as the sectional drawing shows that the house has W-trusses (i.e., framework), none of the partition walls on the upper floor are load-bearing.
Thanks!
This is how the trusses look: Wooden roof trusses in an attic with visible insulation and ventilation pipes.
 
Definitely W-truss.
 
  • Like
petererlandsson1194
  • Laddar…
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.