To make the strongest connection between the carrier beam and the upright post, how should it be done? Allow the post to extend past the carrier beam and attach with carriage bolts? Let the carrier beam rest on top of the post and secure with some type of brackets?
The carrier beam consists of double 45mm
 
It depends on the function and load of the pole.
 
  • Like
JF.
  • Laddar…
J justusandersson said:
It depends on the function and load of the post.
The function is to support the bearing beam for the terrace. I don't know the load, but it's a normal terrace.
 
In that case, it is best to place the post under the support beam and use splice plates on the sides, which you fasten with through bolts both in the post and the support beam.
 
  • Like
JF. and 1 other
  • Laddar…
J justusandersson said:
In that case, it's best to place the post under the beam and use splice plates on the sides, fastening them with through bolts in both the post and the beam.
Is this what you mean?
 
  • A simple sketch showing a rectangular shape with two smaller rectangles on top, likely representing a construction element.
Yes, but there should probably be two bolts in the post to make it really stable.
 
  • Like
JF.
  • Laddar…
J justusandersson said:
Yes, but it should probably be two bolts in the post to make it really stable.
One through the post and one through the beam then. Is a hole plate with dimensions 175x40mm sufficient?
 
Is there really room for a through bolt in a hole plate? The thread title is "strongest fastening." I'm thinking of what is usually called a splice plate that resembles a foundation iron.
 
  • Like
Lorpar and 1 other
  • Laddar…
J justusandersson said:
Is there really room for a through bolt in a perforated plate? The thread title is "strongest fastening." I'm thinking about what is usually called a splice plate that resembles a bracket iron.
It's called a special perforated plate with two holes for M10 bolts. I'll check if I can find the ones you mean.
 
Bauhaus also has similar ones. For example: https://www.bauhaus.se/skarvbeslag-180x40-mm

/Göran

P.S. Do you need to splice the support beams, or are they long enough to cover the entire width of the deck without splicing?
 
  • Like
JF.
  • Laddar…
Sharky58 Sharky58 said:
Bauhaus also has similar ones. For example: [link]

/Göran

P.S Do you need to splice the support beams or do they reach the entire width of the deck unspliced?
It will be 9.6M wide, so I will have to splice.
 
I'm sitting with 13.6m in my construction which starts next week. The same solution (as Justus knows...). Glulam posts 90x90 with double 45x195x5400 beams that are overlapped and jointed at the supports on the posts. I haven't really solved the fastening myself over the joint....

/Göran
 
  • Like
JF.
  • Laddar…
Here is my rigging and bearing line placement:

Blueprint showing joist and beam placement for a construction project, with dimensions and annotations in Swedish.
 
  • Like
JF.
  • Laddar…
Sharky58 Sharky58 said:
I am sitting with 13.6m in my construction which is starting next week. Same solution (as Justus knows...). Glulam posts 90x90 with double 45x195x5400 beams that are overlapped and spliced at the supports on the posts. Haven't quite figured out the fastening myself over the splice....

/Göran
I will have double 45x220 so I will overlap them as you say. Do you mean how you will get the fitting over the splice? Because it might not be completely optimal. Did you buy the fittings you linked from bauhaus?
 
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.