B
Skip the wedge... attach new studs to the old ones on the side, at one end they end up aligned, at the other end 2cm out, then drive in 90mm wood screws again. Presto, you have a frame that's even, just with a 45mm offset against the old ones, but you'll have to live with that... maybe a wedge in the corner, or if you do those walls too, you can place an angle plate between the OSB and plaster, which will stiffen up the corner.

I wouldn't build a wall where the OSB boards aren't supported along the entire length of the stud.
 
If it is an exterior wall and you have space, it is not wrong to frame anew with 45*45 cc 60 or cc 45 somewhere between the existing studs to avoid the thermal bridge; the wall becomes vertical and slightly better insulated.
 
S
Boan said:
Ignore the wedge.. attach new studs to the old ones on the side, in one end they end the same, in the other extend 2cm, drive in 90mm wood screws again. Voilà, you have a frame that is flat, just an offset from the old ones by 45 mm, but you'll have to live with that.. maybe some wedge in the corner, or if you do those walls too, place an angle plate between osb and drywall to stiffen up the corner.

I wouldn't put up a wall where the osb boards don't have support along the entire stud length.
However, it is not recommended to do so.
 
B
For what?
 
S
Boan said:
Why?
the easiest to explain is that you lose insulation.
the best is either wedge or horizontal batten or batten with similar karmskruv.
 
B
If the overlay rule doesn't apply anyway, i.e., is lower than the original rule, it will hardly be noticeable. I would argue that it has a marginal impact.
 
S
Boan said:
If the overlay rule still doesn't apply, i.e., is lower than the original rule, it will hardly be noticeable. I would argue that it has a marginal impact.
unfortunately, the construction does not work
 
It will be the same amount of insulation, but just a bit more complicated to insulate; it should actually be better since there is almost no continuous thermal bridge.
 
S
smurfen72 said:
It becomes the same amount of insulation but a bit more complicated to insulate, it should actually become better since there is almost no continuous thermal bridge.
that's exactly what happens. and air pockets you don't want.
 
Will become more of a thermal bridge with wedges and possibly air pockets depending on how skilled one is at insulating.
 
S
smurfen72 said:
Likely to be more thermal bridge with wedges and possible air pockets depending on how skilled one is at insulating.
perhaps the small length that is the tip. The crack in between can be insulated or foamed
 
And you can't if the rule is on the side?
 
S
smurfen72 said:
And you can't do that if the rule is on the side, can you?
don't mix materials there.
 
What do you mean by mixing materials? What gets worse with the new rule beside instead of wedge?
 
S
smurfen72 said:
What do you mean by mixing materials? What becomes worse with the new rule beside instead of wedge?
can't be bothered to argue, do as you wish.
it just won't turn out well, plain and simple
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.