I have bought a 1.5-story wooden house (from the 1920s) with an extended wall and a 45-degree roof pitch. On the upper floor, there are interior walls with small long narrow storage spaces behind them - I believe some people call them "kattvindar." In any case, I am considering removing these and converting them into sleeping alcoves in a future children's room. There is no wall in the middle of the house, so I wonder if you think the "kattvindar" are part of the load-bearing structure?
I can try to get a blueprint to clarify. My inspector thought it wasn't a problem since houses this old are usually quite over-engineered in the roof???
Anyone who can give me some tips?
 
The braces (which I assume you have) you should probably leave in place. Otherwise, the trusses will lose their load-bearing capacity. But the wall of the crawl space itself shouldn't be load-bearing..? Do you understand what I mean?
 
I understand exactly what you mean. However, this house does not have any sloping braces in the attic. I agree with you that the walls of the attic are not load-bearing, as far as I remember they are also quite thin. Additionally, the attics are positioned at different distances into the house in different rooms.
 
Depends largely on what measurements we are talking about. I also have the same age and inclination. I have understood that the support legs reduce the stresses but also where you place the high legs.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.