Am I correct in thinking that the trusses are self-supporting?

We are going to remove the wall circled in red. The blue walls are already gone. The trusses run in the direction of the yellow lines. As I interpret the sectional drawing, the trusses should bear against the exterior walls as there are no interior walls shown on the drawing (only the heart wall in the basement).

I will probably still put a beam where the wall was, but more because I need posts for electrical outlets. But my thought is that I don't need too large a dimension for the beam.

Am I thinking correctly? Cross-section of a house showing roof trusses, angled at 27°, and dimensions, with emphasis on structural support and wall removal context. Floor plan showing wall to be removed circled in red; yellow lines indicate roof truss direction; blue indicates removed walls; house sections labeled in Swedish.
 
A W-truss of the type seen in the drawing is self-supporting and not supported by any interior walls. However, the wall against the angled part is load-bearing. Understanding is always facilitated by being able to see the entire drawing. Your collage confuses more than it enlightens.
 
  • Like
BirgitS
  • Laddar…
Thank you for the response. So it is as I thought.
That the wall towards the angle is load-bearing, I understood of course.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.