Non-load-bearing all the way?

[Behnam123]

Hello.

See image

The supporting "balken" ends roughly in the middle of the house in the heart wall.
Shouldn't it run along the entire heart wall?

 

[tergo]

reinforcement to carry the beam in the doorway, probably there are posts under the other beams

 

[Behnam123]

reinforcement to carry the beam in the doorway, there are probably posts under the other beams

I don't understand. Do you mean that there are different variants in the same heart wall?

 

[tergo]

since there was supposed to be a doorway under the beam they couldn't place a post there to support the beam so they had to reinforce with a horizontal plank piece
quite a common variant

 

[Behnam123]

since there was supposed to be a doorway under the beam, they couldn't put a post there to support the beam, so they had to reinforce with a horizontal plank
quite a common variant

So you're saying that the horizontal plank doesn't extend all the way to the other short side of the house?
So that horizontal plank isn't load-bearing? Especially not if you're going to have an HEA180 beam resting on a glulam 140x140 after the plank?

 

[b8q]

Just to avoid talking past each other here:
This is how I interpret the image: The standing beam in the doorway (black) supports the standing stud (red). Other studs (e.g. blue) are supported by resting on a standing post (turquoise):

 

[tergo]

Other beams (e.g., blue) are supported by being placed over a standing post (turquoise):

Yes

 

[Behnam123]

See image.

the red-marked is to be removed. 5 meters. and replaced with a HEA 180 resting on a glulam 140x140?
the engineer chose HEA160 and glulam 90x90.
the columns should rest against the core wall in the foundation.

do you see any problems?