I advocate everything related to innovative innovation in construction technology, but in this case, I don't understand the difference between this technique, where a concrete pump has to spray steel fiber concrete on the inside for the house to have load-bearing capacity in the frame, compared to the cost/insulation effect of if I go and pump concrete into Styrofoam blocks? http://www.dorocell.se/eway/default.aspx?pid=273&trg=MainPage_5980&MainPage_5980=6419:0:10,1992
The cost is the same for the concrete pump, whether you have to pump extremely slowly when filling the Styrofoam blocks or when you spray concrete on the inside so that the frame becomes self-supporting - so what is the gain, the environment, the economy, the heat effect?
The cost is the same for the concrete pump, whether you have to pump extremely slowly when filling the Styrofoam blocks or when you spray concrete on the inside so that the frame becomes self-supporting - so what is the gain, the environment, the economy, the heat effect?
No thermal bridge where the blocks meet the slab? Cheaper blocks? Better U-value? Don't know but it was interesting anyway 
jeppeknaster. "frigolit" all the way. A layer of frigolit as a mold for the plate.
Nope, he has ordered laaarge cell foam blocks from Dorocell and made his own construction.Hålta said:
Exactly, also in the ceiling. I wonder if it would have been better to use 2x15cm blocks under the slab instead of 1x30cm.byggare henke said:
Yes, overlapping is indeed better.
Mighty construction I must say should insulate well
should insulate well says like jeppeknaster. small mistake with the blocks under the plate