Hi,

We have a project at home where we want to widen a doorway by about 40 cm. We live in a multi-family building, in a condominium, and the association couldn't say whether the wall in question is load-bearing or not, but we've obtained plans from the city planning office.

As I read this, there are no beams in the wall in question (marked in yellow). Can one conclude from this documentation that the wall is not load-bearing, and based on this, would it be safe to start work?

/ Amateur
 
  • Floor plan of an apartment with a yellow-highlighted wall between living room and bedroom, indicating a proposed doorway widening project.
  • Blueprint of an apartment building with highlighted section showing a wall in question; possibly related to a door widening project.
No, that wall is not load-bearing. This is clearly evident from the original drawing. The vertical load-bearing is managed by the exterior walls and the two interior walls. These walls are built with at least a full brick's width.
 
  • Like
16386
  • Laddar…
I think you probably need to see the bjälklagsarmeringen to be able to say that the wall is not load-bearing. The wall is still 150mm, and these walls stand with relatively small cc.
 
There may also be steel in the floor slabs. The text "Trapplanen armeras med 9 mm" etc. suggests that only these have regular reinforcement. Therefore, I don't think there is a reinforcement drawing, but a section or a more focused K-drawing wouldn't be entirely wrong. The age of the drawing is a bit hard to determine. Personally, I would guess early 20s. But TS might know.
 
J justusandersson said:
There may also be steel in the floor structures. The text "Trapplanen armeras med 9 mm" etc. suggests that only these have normal reinforcement. Therefore, I don't think there is any reinforcement drawing, but a section or a more straightforward K-drawing wouldn't be entirely wrong. It's a bit difficult to determine the age of the drawing. Personally, I would guess early 20s. But TS might know.
Hi and thanks for the response!

The building was constructed in 1932. Okay, I doubt there is more information to obtain but can take one last check with the city planning office to see if there is any additional information that could help me further.
 
Considering bathrooms in a two-room and kitchen apartment, I would guess late 20s or early 30s. And garbage chutes also came a bit into the 20s, right?
 
1 16386 said:
Considering bathrooms in two rooms and a kitchen, I would guess late 20s or early 30s. And garbage chutes probably also came a bit into the 20s?
J Awald89 said:
The building was constructed in 1932. Okay, I'm doubtful that there's more data to gather, but I can take one last check with the city planning office to see if there's anything else that can help me further.
 
Thanks - I must have missed updating the app on my phone and therefore didn't see the latest post from TS.
 
  • Like
Kane
  • Laddar…
Is there a blueprint of the basement/foundation that might provide clarity (or ask for a key and go down to check if the wall is also there).
 
Check the basement to determine if a wall in a four-story building is load-bearing?
 
If the wall does not exist in the basement, it is likely not load-bearing 4 floors up.
 
  • Like
patrikd84
  • Laddar…
J Awald89 said:
Hello and thank you for the response!

The building was constructed in 1932. Okay, I doubt there's more documentation to retrieve, but I can take one last check with the city planning office to see if there's any more material that can help me further.
The city planning office should be able to assist you. At least in Stockholm, they would have all the documents for an apartment building from that time. But considering the wall thicknesses and the beams (which are all marked above windows and openings in heart walls), I can't see that the wall is load-bearing. However, it is slightly thicker than about 10 cm since it was originally separating apartments.
 
  • Like
justusandersson
  • Laddar…
Fun thread for us drawing nerds... Built in 1932, so it should be concrete floors, but not entirely certain. The drawing style is old-fashioned while the layouts are more modern. Where is the house located? It feels a bit provincial. There should be detailed drawings, even if they are not digitized.
 
Hello again,

Thank you for all the responses. I have now taken the time to submit a new request to the city planning office for more detailed drawings. In the meantime, I can offer a drawing of the ground floor.

Moreover, I have found out that the neighbor's apartment has made a similar modification in the same type of wall, which was previously also an apartment-separating wall. I am uploading that marking as well.

Since that person no longer resides there, I am awaiting a response to see how they managed it.

I can also inform you that the wall in question seems to be made of brick (red dust when drilling) — is this not good?

Best regards,

awald
 
  • Floor plan of an apartment with highlighted wall, possibly red brick, separating rooms; includes marked dimensions and notes on beams and supports.
  • Floor plan of a ground floor showing detailed architectural elements and room dimensions for a building project.
Since it is originally an apartment-separating wall, anything other than brick would be a surprise. The thickness, 15 cm according to the drawing, checks out: 1.5 cm plaster + 12 cm brick (= half stone) + 1.5 cm plaster.
 
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.