The load from the roof is probably negligible if it is on the ground floor, it spreads in the masonry.

A drawing of the floor structure is needed to be able to calculate properly. It may be sufficient to knock in an L-steel from each side.
 
  • Like
karlmb
  • Laddar…
F ErlandJ said:
Have been in contact with the municipality, slightly different rules outside the detailed planning area.
Can you elaborate?
 
Facade changes do not require a building permit, and changes in load-bearing parts may require a building notice.
 
F ErlandJ said:
Facade changes do not require planning permission and changes to load-bearing parts may require a building notification.
Yes. But this is a change in load-bearing parts.
 
Yes, and? I already wrote that I have been in contact with the municipality. I don't know if all municipalities have the same requirements for building notifications.
 
  • Like
Anonymiserad 405730
  • Laddar…
F ErlandJ said:
Yes, and? I wrote that I have been in contact with the municipality. I don't know if all municipalities have the same requirements for construction notification.
But an intervention in the construction must reasonably involve a construction notification and a completed calculation. On any measures, with the following control plan. Even in Knäckebrödhult, I think.
 
  • Like
karlmb
  • Laddar…
P
Lulaua Lulaua said:
The load from the roof is probably negligible if it's on the ground floor, as it spreads in the masonry.

A drawing of the floor structure is needed to be able to calculate properly. It might be enough to insert an L-steel from each side.
I Installation said:
But an intervention in the construction must reasonably involve building notification and a performed calculation. On possible measures, with a subsequent control plan. Even in Knäckebrödhult I think.
But he has been in contact with the municipality and if they say it's not needed then that's the case in this instance!
 
Janu78 said:
But he has been in contact with the municipality and if they say it's not needed, then that's the case in this instance!
Let me correct you both, I haven't said that a construction report isn't needed, rather that I don't know if all municipalities have the same requirements. Can we end this side discussion? Those who are especially interested in this angle of my question can start their own thread about the conditions and regulations for construction reports.
 
P
F ErlandJ said:
I need to correct you both, I didn't say that a construction notification isn't needed, but rather that I'm not sure if all municipalities have the same requirements. Can we end this side discussion? Those who are particularly interested in this angle of my question can start their own thread about conditions and rules for construction notifications.
But what you wrote earlier gives the impression that it's not needed even if you didn't state it explicitly!
 
  • Like
karlmb
  • Laddar…
Janu78 said:
But what you wrote earlier gives the impression that it isn't needed even if you didn't explicitly state it!
Oh, then it was unclear. Read the sentence in two parts:
- Facade changes don't need a building permit
and
- changes in load-bearing parts may require a building notification. (the reservation is because I don't know if it's the same everywhere)

If I meant that nothing needs a building permit or notification, I would have written:
"Facade changes and changes in load-bearing parts don't need a building permit or notification."
 
P
F ErlandJ said:
Well, then it was unclear. Read the sentence in two parts:
- Façade changes don't require a building permit
and
- changes to load-bearing parts may require a building notification. (the reservation is because I'm not sure if it's the same everywhere)

If I had meant that nothing requires a building permit or notification, I would have written:
"Façade changes and changes to load-bearing parts don't require a building permit or notification."
That's what I interpreted, see below:

Yes, and? I wrote that I had been in contact with the municipality. I don't know if all municipalities have the same requirements for building notifications.
 
P
F ErlandJ said:
Well, then it was unclear. Read the sentence in two parts:
- Facade changes do not require a building permit
and
- changes to load-bearing parts may require a building notification. (the reservation is because I don't know if this is the same everywhere)

If I had meant that nothing requires a building permit or building notification, I would have written:
"Facade changes and changes to load-bearing parts do not require a building permit or building notification."
But as far as I'm concerned, we can end the discussion since you have explained it😉
 
  • Like
Färdigrenoverad
  • Laddar…
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.