Hello.
I have plans to open up a three-meter opening in the facade. A glulam beam is dimensioned, but I'm a bit concerned about the fastening.
My idea is to screw it on the inside and fasten it to each column with two through bolts. There will be two columns that are cut and then fastened to a total of four, including the two load-bearing ones.
Does this sound like a normal procedure?
Regards
I have plans to open up a three-meter opening in the facade. A glulam beam is dimensioned, but I'm a bit concerned about the fastening.
My idea is to screw it on the inside and fasten it to each column with two through bolts. There will be two columns that are cut and then fastened to a total of four, including the two load-bearing ones.
Does this sound like a normal procedure?
Regards
If you mean that the glulam beam is only supported by a few screws, I would be hesitant; you want the load to be taken straight down in a "pillar" or standing stud. I would notch the studs so that the glulam beam also fits "into" them.O Oskar Ståhl said:Hello.
I plan to create a three-meter opening in the facade. A glulam beam has been dimensioned, but I'm a bit concerned about the attachment.
My idea is to screw it on the inside and attach it to each pillar with two through bolts. This will involve cutting two pillars, making a total of four including the two load-bearing ones.
Does this sound like a normal procedure?
Regards
Or reinforce the standing "pillars" with extra standing studs under the glulam beam.
That's about what I suspected. I was thinking of two posts next to the columns that will be kept so that the load is taken directly down to the ends of the glulam beam. How much should I notch? They are 100x100. Will 50mm be good?B b8q said:If you mean that the glulam beam is only supported by a few screws, I would be hesitant, you want the load to be borne directly down into a "column" or standing stud. I would notch the studs so that the glulam beam comes "into" them as well. Or reinforce the standing "columns" with extra standing studs under the glulam beam.
Sounds good to me - but I'm not a structural engineer.O Oskar Ståhl said:
Click here to reply