S
H hul said:
Are A-houses built with or without cross battens?
Can't you read my misspelled text now?
 
S
I just think it's funny with these school desk bosses. Who basically just care about things.
 
H
SBH said:
Can't you read my misspelled text now?
It was just a question because I didn't know if he was replying to what you wrote incorrectly or when you changed your mind.

By the way, can you not answer why the steel profiles when installing facade panels/stone etc. are perforated?
 
H
Definitely don't think the admin should delete anything.
Split such up the thread into different threads.
It is a current topic, so it should remain.

Instead, maybe clean up some posts if you want to do something.
 
H hul said:
Unreasonable question, how am I supposed to know how much moisture your façade lets through?
Your construction might be a real jerry-built, which of course requires more ventilation.


If you don't ventilate the moisture away, you'll end up with a single-seal construction, and I think we can agree that's something you don't want.
I didn't mention my façade; whether it's a jerry-built or not has nothing to do with the research numbers, does it?????

What I wanted to discuss is whether the numbers, i.e., air exchange, are sufficient for all options or which level one should potentially aim for. But you wanted to talk about my façade, my jerry-built construction, or if it leaks moisture/water, which is completely irrelevant......
 
H hul said:
Are A-hus built with or without cross battens?
Post 15 is an image of the A-hus wall. They do as Isover prescribes.
 
H
R RoBo said:
Post 15 is a picture of an A-hus wall. They do as Isover prescribes.
Okay, then I know.
 
S
R roli said:
I didn't write about my façade, whether it's a shoddy construction or not has nothing to do with the researcher numbers, right????

What I wanted to discuss was whether the numbers, i.e., air exchange, are sufficient for all alternatives or which level one should possibly aim for. But you wanted to talk about my façade, my shoddy construction, or if it leaks moisture/water, which is completely irrelevant......
Research is conducted with an agenda. A company helps with its "knowledge".
 
S
H hul said:
Okay, then I know
You probably have husmanskost close at hand. What's written there?
 
H
R roli said:
I did not write about my facade; whether it is poorly constructed or not has nothing to do with the research numbers, does it?????

What I wanted to address is whether the numbers, i.e., air exchange rates, are sufficient for all the alternatives or which level is potentially the one to aim for. But you wanted to talk about my facade, my shoddy construction, or if it leaks moisture/water, which is completely irrelevant......
That was just an example.
You can't set a number on what is an acceptable air exchange since it depends on so many parameters.
Type of facade, geographical location, whether the house is on a hill, densely populated area?

But when there is research showing that only horizontal battens are not okay, I would follow that.
Why are steel profiles always perforated otherwise?
 
H
SBH said:
Research is conducted with an ulterior motive. A company assists with its "knowledge".
Do you mean they are the terrible bleacher suppliers who are on the move and want to sell more bleachers?
 
H
SBH said:
You probably have traditional Swedish cuisine close at hand. What is written there
Why don't you answer why steel profiles are perforated?
 
S
H hul said:
Why don't you answer why steel profiles are perforated?
Husama
 
S
H hul said:
Why don't you answer why steel profiles are perforated?
Why are you bringing in an assembly where you have completely different conditions?
There are panels that should be mounted with T profiles in order for them to be sealed.
 
S
SBH said:
You probably have traditional Swedish food close at hand. What's written there
It should say Husama.
 
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.