5,859 views ·
31 replies
6k views
31 replies
Dimensional planning woodshed
Hi,
I want to use this drawing for a firewood shed: https://www.byggbeskrivningar.se/bygg-med-limtra/bygg-en-vedbod/
But I would like to increase the width from 2230 mm to 5000 mm.
Will the glulam posts 115x115 and glulam beam 90x180 handle it, or should I move up a dimension?
The snow zone is 2.5
I tried looking at Svensk Trä for spans, but I don't know if 90x180 is an odd dimension since I couldn't even find it.
If I have to move up a dimension, maybe it will look odd, and it might simply be better to construct two firewood sheds according to the dimensions in the drawing.
Grateful for input
I want to use this drawing for a firewood shed: https://www.byggbeskrivningar.se/bygg-med-limtra/bygg-en-vedbod/
But I would like to increase the width from 2230 mm to 5000 mm.
Will the glulam posts 115x115 and glulam beam 90x180 handle it, or should I move up a dimension?
The snow zone is 2.5
I tried looking at Svensk Trä for spans, but I don't know if 90x180 is an odd dimension since I couldn't even find it.
If I have to move up a dimension, maybe it will look odd, and it might simply be better to construct two firewood sheds according to the dimensions in the drawing.
Grateful for input
For a simple woodshed, you don't need such large dimensions, regular timber will do just fine and you can avoid the expensive glulam.J jehr said:
F fribygg said:
Well, I have plenty of 145 treated timber beams left over from the deck build, so that might be something.F fribygg said:
How long?
If you're going for a few three compartments with maybe a 3m span, I think used 145x45 would be very strong, it's not like you'll have a pool or something similar on top, right? If you just use standard decking wood 28* 145 on edge with 2.3m between the posts it will hold but might give a slight sag which doesn't matter for a woodshed.
If you're going for a few three compartments with maybe a 3m span, I think used 145x45 would be very strong, it's not like you'll have a pool or something similar on top, right? If you just use standard decking wood 28* 145 on edge with 2.3m between the posts it will hold but might give a slight sag which doesn't matter for a woodshed.
change the dimensions so that it is tall enough that you don't hit your head on the ceiling when bending in to load/unload wood in it, your scalp will thank you. And a slightly longer overhang on the front of the roof wouldn't hurt
In a typical residential area, however, you might need to adjust the dimensions so it doesn't become a building if the neighbors and the building committee are picky.L LantbrukarN said:
That one feels incredibly oversized. You could have halved the thickness of all that and it would still work excellently. At least that's what I think! .. snow load on that roof is something you don't need to think about either.🤔👍😊
If the pool is going to be on top, I think the dimensioning might be reasonable, though 90 mm thick laminated beams sound excessive, even then, 56 mm would have sufficed.Farstatjej90 said:
They are 5.1 meters long! Maybe I can glue two together to make posts? No, I only plan to have snow on the roof.F fribygg said:How long? If you're aiming for a couple of sections with maybe a 3m span, I think used 145x45 would be very strong. It's not like you're putting a pool or something similar on top? If you're just using regular decking wood 28*145 on edge with 2.3m between the posts, it will hold, but there might be some sagging, which doesn’t matter for a woodshed.
I plan to increase the depth a bit so you can have three logs of 30 cm and they are still not in the "rain." But concerning the height, I agree. However, this is also meant to be a bit of a fence as well, where it would look nice if it were low over a longer span, simply.L LantbrukarN said:
---
Thanks for all the other responses!