I think 70x70 is both more attractive and strong enough.
Place the posts far enough apart so that the longitudinal beams extend past two "sections"; it becomes much sturdier, meaning with, for example, 5.4m longitudinally, the posts will be 2.7m apart.
Built one a few weeks ago, used 70x70 posts, ground anchors, and 28x120 decking. Then I did as larsbj wrote with the length in between. I think I went for 2.4 meters between and 4.8 meters decking length, and then not splicing on the same post
Don't you think the pickets will sag after a while if you have such a long distance between the posts? I probably wouldn't have more than 2 meters between them, if even that.
Don't you think the fence pickets will sag after a while if you have such a long distance between the posts? I wouldn't have more than 2 meters apart, if even that.
It entirely depends on the dimensions of the longitudinal rail.
The longest-lasting rule will also be 28x120, meaning the same timber and dimension as the slats. Can I have a greater distance between the posts if I use 95x95 instead of 70x70?
The longest rule will also be 28x120, meaning the same timber and dimension as the slats. Can I have a larger gap between the posts if I use 95x95 instead of 70x70?
As I mentioned, I have about 2.5 meters between my posts, I wouldn't want more because it would become wobbly. Not because of the posts, but because of the decking timber. So if you want a larger gap, you need something thicker than 28.
Looks nicer with fine-sawn than decking for the fence, I think.
Maybe, but it's really convenient to be able to build a fence from the waste of a wooden terrace. Then I plan to paint it white, so it will be less noticeable that it's treated.
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.