5,076 views ·
55 replies
5k views
55 replies
Load at the end of a pier.
Surely it's the wood that costs? Threaded rod, nuts, and some galvanized plates are less money than your waste?
Make sure to tie the different beams together with noggings so that you distribute the load in the construction.
Make sure to tie the different beams together with noggings so that you distribute the load in the construction.
Ok, and I assume you're avoiding fixtures below the water level because you want to skip a building permit?D Derbyboy said:
Since we had a load case from the beginning with complete data, I wanted it supplemented before I even start calculating it, yes.Den ofrivillige klåparen said:
And that you cannot neglect the self-weight of a construction that is supposed to be a free-hanging cantilever of two meters, that should be obvious to most..
Start calculating then. Set up force and moment equilibrium. Make an estimate of the bending stiffness based on the mass TS estimated and the three beams mentioned. Then calculate the deflection at a point load at the far end. Compare it to what you consider an acceptable deflection. Also, report maximum stresses in critical sections and compare with the fracture limit for wood. Alternatively, calculate forces and moments in each construction part and compare with tabulated values, which should be available for free through, for example, Svenskt trä. You should especially study what happens with the attachment forces, which was TS's question. See the thread title.Violina said:
If you want to impress, also calculate other failure modes, such as fatigue of metallic components in the attachment, buckling, etc.
Or is it that you lack knowledge in this and guessed that the self-weight has a significant impact on the forces in the attachment, and cannot manage to back down when you are wrong?
Last edited by a moderator:
