I have two questions about indoor ceilings:

We have received a building permit for an extension. On the construction drawing, the designer has drawn drywall ceilings throughout the extension even though we have panels in the existing space. We want panels, but to be sure, I wonder if there are fire regulations for new builds that require drywall?

In the wet room, he has specified foil-coated chipboard (which contradicts the fire question...). If you install panels, should you have something underneath in place of the "foiled"?

I could certainly ask the designer, but he was an unusual man who was not very attentive to his work and more concerned about how we are "running" our extension project.
 
The entire building is a fire compartment, and then there are no requirements for fire-separating intermediate floors if I have interpreted the rules correctly.
 
Can never imagine that you need drywall behind if you live in a house. Drywall is often drawn in because about 95% will use it.
 
Thank you, that seems reasonable so let's go with it. How about question 2 then? I guess the foil is to stop steam. What do you do behind a panel ceiling?
 
The foil is to get a different surface and avoid painting. There's a vapor barrier behind that should be used but only on the upper floor. You should plast the new exterior walls as well, right? Then use the same as there.
 
Aha! Sure, there's plastic in both the walls and the ceiling, so let's just go ahead with the panel ceiling.
"Folierad" sounded more functional than aesthetic :)

huggan said:
The foil is used to get a different surface and avoid painting. There should be a vapor barrier behind it, but only on the upper floor. You're going to plasticize the new exterior walls as well, right? Then you use the same as there.
 
You should not have plastic in exterior walls that are provided with a completely tight waterproofing membrane in wet rooms.
 
cecar33 said:
You should not have plastic in exterior walls that are equipped with a completely waterproof barrier in wet rooms.
There are divided opinions on this matter.
 
Can you read about it in?
 
It is OK to leave the plastic if you use sufficiently dense waterproofing layers, such as modern foil systems.
 
Last edited:
Well, everything can be discussed, but the link referred to above pertains to a wall with a roll-applied moisture barrier performed in 2005-2006, so it is not relevant. A denser moisture barrier does not solve the problem with moisture between the barriers either. The wall consists of damp room boards, plyfa, studs, 45 mm insulation, and plastic (vapor barrier), so there is an opportunity for normal moisture migration into the construction from the sides, from above, and from below, and it then remains between these moisture barriers. Removing the vapor barrier makes it correct and follows the same principle as other exterior walls with the moisture barrier/vapor barrier on the inside.
 
If moisture can get in from the sides, it can also come from there. The important thing is that no moisture is added by coming through the waterproofing membrane, and it is considered not to do so with modern waterproofing membranes.
 
BVK says that if you have foil or plastic mat as a waterproofing layer, there will be no problems with double vapor barriers.
 
However, if you roll the waterproofing layer you have to come up with a solution and then it's not good to remove the plastic in the outer wall as I mentioned before.
 
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.