5,755 views ·
26 replies
6k views
26 replies
Restoring reinforcement in wall after craftsmen
Moderator
· Stockholm
· 57 787 posts
But how much is cut?
Moderator
· Stockholm
· 57 787 posts
But I mean, how long of a stretch of the wall. Cutting a single iron doesn't matter. Except possibly if it's in the corner of a concrete beam.
I thought the reinforcement took up most of the lateral forces? You mean I shouldn't even try to restore the reinforcement? I think I still want to do that since nothing is stopping it. The craftsman's cutting was completely pointless as well. The rebar wasn't in the way of anything.H hempularen said:
Is it standard practice to just leave it be? I've seen trenches for pipes and ventilation where they've just left it, etc.
When do you need to splice rebar then?
Simplified, it is the reinforcement that needs to be spliced for full strength, and this is done by overlapping the bars. The splices you found are expensive special products used in phased beams, etc.
Crack reinforcement should also be spliced, but we can leave that aside for your situation; it mostly pertains to the casting phase.
Crack reinforcement should also be spliced, but we can leave that aside for your situation; it mostly pertains to the casting phase.
With full respect that I am not knowledgeable here. Can you really be so sure?W witten said:Simplified, it's the reinforcement that needs to be spliced for the full force, and that's done by overlapping the bars. The splices you found are expensive special products used in staged beams, etc.
Crack reinforcement should also be spliced, but we can leave that aside for your situation, as it mostly concerns the casting phase.
The screws cost 150.-/each, I need 4.
The bars that were cut are 16mm, 2 pieces, in a threshold, load-bearing wall.
Some form of splicing should still be done. Just throwing in splice pieces without securing them during pouring feels a bit silly?
Ok, but I'm not satisfied if the strength of the house has been reduced even by 1% after I've paid 50 k for renovating the pipes.O olofh said:
Surely, one is anxious because it's one's own house, but you also want to be accountable for it later. Besides, the plumbing company should pay anyway. It wouldn't have been any problem at all to chip away the concrete and fit the pipes underneath. So, as I see it, it's a workmanship error.
Am I thinking foolishly?
Yes, that's crazy, the pipe company won't pay anyway. Firstly, they should be given the opportunity to correct deficiencies, and secondly, this will not be considered as such. It's good that you have protruding iron so you can fix your reinforcement mesh.KJD said:
Ok, but I'm not satisfied if the strength of the house has been reduced even by 1% after I've paid 50 kkr to renovate the pipes.
I guess you're understandably worried since it's your own house, but you also want to stand by it later on. The pipe company should pay anyway. It wouldn't have been any problem at all to chip away the concrete and slide the pipes underneath. So, as I see it, it's an execution error.
Am I thinking crazily?
But it might have been possible to slide the pipes underneath by chipping around, but then it would have taken more work time.



