As the title indicates, I need to go through a ceiling beam in the intermediate floor to reach where the toilet is intended to be placed. It's an old house that was remodeled a bit in the '70s. The beam I plan to go through is 75x230mm and 1170mm long. In the middle, it supports a ledger from another ceiling beam.

What do you think? Add plywood on both sides and bring out the hole saw, or should one use metal? How far do you need to reinforce?

The circle indicates where I want to bring up the drainage, and the pipe is where it is currently located.
 
  • Sketch of a wooden beam structure showing dimensions; 230x75mm beam with 1170mm length. A circle marks planned pipe location; existing pipe shown.
It is important to make the hole as close to the center of the beam as possible and centered on the height. Reinforce with plywood on both sides. A 110 mm hole in a 230 mm high beam is actually too large. The saving grace for the beam is that it is so short. The best option would otherwise have been to move the beam slightly, but that may not be possible.
 
Thank you for your feedback.
What is the reason you think the implementation should be done near the midpoint of the beam's length?
 
This is because the internal forces in the beam differ slightly in different parts. Hole drilling at the beam's midpoint lengthwise does the least damage. One should avoid hole drilling near the supports. This is general knowledge.
 
  • Like
MagHam
  • Laddar…
Yes, there is a bit to think about. You come relatively close to the budget no matter what you do in this case. The question is how to counteract that in the best way.
Thank you for your thoughts.
 
Maybe I should swap the toilet and shower corner after all. A 75 hole for the shower should be doable without much hassle, one would think.
 
  • Floor plan of a bathroom showing the layout with a toilet, shower area, and sink, discussing a possible swap of toilet and shower corner.
A 75 mm hole is much better.
 
Perhaps it is a constructor who answered, but I have to wonder. With 21mm plywood, one on each side of the beam that is fully glued with wood glue and screwed tightly. I find it hard to see that it would weaken the beam. 42mm plywood is stronger than a stud, at least that's what I've learned.
 
The purpose of the plywood is to prevent cracking, not to compensate for the reduced load-bearing capacity. Threads in the Byggahus forum have many readers who may have similar but not identical problems.
 
And if the plywood was mounted as I suggested, along the entire length of the bank. Don't you think it would work?
 
It is clear that if you glue together two 21 mm plywood sheets, they can function as a beam. Plywood and wood have comparable elastic moduli. Plywood is absolutely less sensitive to perforations.
 
Do you have no possibility to prop under the beam on either side of the hole?
 
P Per1234 said:
Do you have the option to support under the beam on either side of the hole?
No, unfortunately not.
We are reconsidering the bathroom layout. I'll get back to you if we make a hole.
 
I Ivar Nelson said:
No, unfortunately not.
We are reconsidering the layout of the bathroom. I'll get back if we make any holes
How much do you have left on the top side bottom side?
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.