Hello, I want to double-check with the rest of you how. I'm thinking. I'm renovating the house and converting a former bedroom into a bathroom.

As it seems, I have to deviate from the recommendations (GVK).
___________________________________
My basic conditions are:
- Existing floor joist C24 45x190 CC60 Support distance 2990mm
- Floor chipboard 22mm

On this, I plan to glue/screw floor gypsum, then reinforce and apply leveling compound/floor screed.
___________________________________

As it looks, the problem is that the floor joist is 190mm instead of the recommended 220mm.

What do the rest of you think, with the double reinforcement regarding floor gypsum + reinforcement/floor screed? Will the floor achieve the equivalent stability that the GVK recommendations seek?

The alternative is that I rip up the entire floor and add additional joists on cc30, followed by the aforementioned Floor chipboard/floor gypsum/reinforcement and floor screed.

Grateful for your objections and thoughts.

/Tobias
 
Your 45x190 in combination with screwed-glued 22 mm chipboard is sufficient to meet both deflection and flex requirements. Mainly due to the limited span. The other adds nothing from a stability perspective.
 
  • Like
TobiasGren
  • Laddar…
J justusandersson said:
Your 45x190 in combination with screw-glued 22 mm particleboard is enough to meet both deflection and bounce requirements. Mainly due to the limited span. The other adds nothing from a stability point of view.
Thank you for your response. What is your reasoning based on, can I calculate this in some way? As it is. Now there is a 30mm difference in the joists compared to the recommendations, which should then imply a certain/significant difference due to the deviation.
 
T TobiasGren said:
What do you base the reasoning on
Elasticity theory and the applicable construction rules. GVK is an industry standard.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.