Hello!
I have been reading the forum for a long time, but this will be my first post.

Please see the images below to better understand the text.

I live in a house where the core is from the early 1900s and parts of the interior walls are plank walls.
We are planning to fix the surface and take the opportunity to install the electrical wiring. The idea is to then install new pipes/conduits and electrical cables.
I was thinking of either removing a few of the planks or making grooves in them and finally mounting thin drywall sheets on top.

However, I have learned that plank walls in older houses can be important for the structural integrity, which makes me a bit worried.
I have an inspection hole where I can see that there are vertical studs and then horizontal noggings, which has allowed the mounting of standing and lying planks. The planks are about 90*20 mm.

Does anyone have experience with this and know how/if one can determine if the planks are load-bearing? Would you affect this by making 2 cm grooves in horizontal and vertical directions?

Thanks in advance!
 
  • Inside corner of a room with vertical wooden planks on the wall, visible electrical wiring at the ceiling, and a thermostat mounted on the wall.
  • Vertical wooden plank wall with visible electrical tubing mounted near the ceiling. White ceiling panels and door frame in an early 1900s house.
  • Close-up of a hole in a wooden plank wall, revealing insulation material inside.
The best way is probably to fish inside the wall. Make more holes in strategic places so you can reach and drill through the kortlingarna.
 
  • Like
Dublin
  • Laddar…
It might be the best, but there will be a lot of holes and fishing as a total of 10 meters of flex pipes will certainly be needed in different directions.
P Peter_Ker said:
The best is probably to fish inside the wall. Make more holes in strategic places so you can access and drill through the kortlingar.
P Peter_Ker said:
The best is probably to fish inside the wall. Make more holes in strategic places so you can access and drill through the kortlingar.
 
C
What does "fixa ytskiktet" mean? What is the plan there?
 
90x20 are boards and hardly load-bearing. You probably have a frame that bears the load and boards on either side of it as a surface layer. The plank walls I have seen have been at the thinnest about 45 and about 120 wide.
 
  • Like
Roger Fundin and 7 others
  • Laddar…
C cpalm said:
What does "fix the surface layer" mean? What is the plan there?
C cpalm said:
What does "fix the surface layer" mean? What is the plan there?
The idea was to install renovation plasterboards on top of the plank walls, then putty and paint/wallpaper and replace moldings, baseboards, etc.
 
C
I would run ROT boxes, conduit and fish tape. Go horizontally as much as possible and choose a few well-chosen places where you need to go vertically over kortlingarna where you remove a board. Note that you need to loosen 3-4 boards to avoid breaking the tongue. Not that it might matter much if you are going to plaster anyway.
 
  • Like
Dublin
  • Laddar…
What you show in the picture seems to be a wall of rough-sawn tongue and groove boards; the boards themselves should not be load-bearing.

I have a house with plank walls; the planks are tongue and grooved and about 2-3 inches thick, i.e., approximately 6 cm. On one side, it's just the planks, on the other side, there's a spacer of about one inch, and then rough-sawn tongue and groove boards that are also about an inch thick.

I have recessed all electricity; in the plank wall, I sawed off the outer part of the tongue (it was quick to track with a circular saw, one cut, and laid the conduit, drilled for a standard box (exactly the diameter of the box), on the rough-sawn side, I drilled with a hole saw where the horizontal battens go and then fished the wires through. Rough-sawn boards, spacer + renovation gypsum was just enough to fit a Multifix BP-202 box (the usual green ones).

Horizontally, I have always run the conduits on the rough-sawn side, i.e., in the cavity in the wall, never cut into the planks. Doing so would affect the load-bearing capacity. Vertically removing 1/3 of the thickness in a tongue doesn't matter.
Alternatively, the conduits are run in the ceiling, which is lowered 22 mm to accommodate the wiring.
 
  • Like
Roger Fundin
  • Laddar…
Karl-Ove Qvarfordt Karl-Ove Qvarfordt said:
90x20 are boards and hardly load-bearing. You probably have a frame that carries and boards on both sides of this as a surface layer. The plank walls I have seen have been as thin as about 45 and about 120 wide.
That was my thought too but I felt uncertain
N nb. said:
What you show in the picture seems to be a wall of råspont, the råspont itself should not be load-bearing.

I have a house with plank walls, the planks are tongue-and-groove and about 2-3 inches thick, i.e. 6 cm-ish. On one side there are only the planks, on the other side there is a distance of about an inch and then råspont which is also about an inch.

I have embedded all the electricity, in the plank wall I have sawed off the outer part of the tongue (then it was quick to track with a circular saw, one cut and put in the conduit, drilled for a regular box (with exactly the box's diameter, on the råspont side I have drilled with a hole saw where the horizontal battens go and then fished. Råspont, gap + renovation gypsum was just enough to fit a Multifix BP-202 box (the usual green ones).

Horizontally, I have always run the conduits on the råspont side, i.e. in the gap in the wall, never cut into the planks. That would have affected the load-bearing capacity. Vertically removing 1/3 of the thickness in a tongue does not matter.
Or the conduits are run in the ceiling, which is lowered 22 mm to make room for electricity.
Sounds like you are right. It's probably råspont 20x95 mm that has been used. Then I should be able to make 2 cm grooves at least without worrying.
 
It's enough to cut 12 mm deep and lay cable, not pipes/tubes. Fully allowed even if many electricians don't know it. There are more threads about this here.
 
  • Sad
Roger Fundin
  • Laddar…
Heart walls in older villas do not have to be constructed with solid three-inch planks. They can be "sandwich" style: two sides with vertically tongue-and-groove boards with dense supporting studs/noggins in between.
 
  • Like
cpalm
  • Laddar…
M MagHam said:
The heart walls in older villas don't necessarily have to be constructed with solid three-inch planks. It can be a "sandwich" with two sides of vertical tongue and groove boards with dense supporting studs/nogging in between.
Not in the early 1900s which this thread refers to...
 
D Dr spikskalle said:
Hello!
I've been reading the forum for a long time but this will be my first own post.

Please see the pictures below to better understand the text.

I live in a house where the core of the house is from the early 1900s and parts of the interior walls are plank walls.
We're planning to fix the surface layer and take the opportunity to recess the electricity. The idea is to then run new pipes/tubes and electrical cables.
I had thought of either removing a couple of the planks or making grooves in them and finally mounting thin plasterboards on top.

However, I have learned that plank walls in older houses may be important for load-bearing capacity, which makes me a bit worried.
I have an inspection hole where I see that there are vertical studs and then horizontal noggings which have allowed vertical and horizontal planks to be mounted. The planks are about 90*20 mm.

Does anyone have experience with this and know how/if it's possible to determine if the planks are load-bearing? Would you affect this by making 2 cm grooves in horizontal and vertical directions?

Thanks in advance!
Since you're going to put plasterboard on the walls anyway, can’t you just extend the wall enough so the tubes fit behind the plasterboards? It seems like less work than carving into the wall or removing boards, etc.
 
  • Like
TRJBerg
  • Laddar…
P Processengine said:
Since you are going to put plasterboard on the walls anyway, can't you just extend the wall enough so that the pipes fit behind the plasterboards? Feels like less work than carving into the wall or removing boards etc.
But then TS will have a fragile single-layer plasterboard with all its disadvantages.
 
I just did this in a room. I used a hole saw where the boxes were supposed to be. Then I used the hole saw at the top of the wall as well and ran vp pipes in between. It was significantly easier with a rigid vp pipe instead of a hose. From outlet/switch straight up to the ceiling then out onto the roof boarding where everything was connected via ceiling boxes. Then furring strips in the ceiling + surface layer.
 
  • Like
Roger Fundin
  • Laddar…
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.