Hi
I am planning to open up between two rooms. To do this, I need to remove a wall but am now wondering if it is load-bearing?

Someone who knows more about this than I might be able to see it just by examining the attached images...

Thanks in advance!
 
  • Interior view showing a partially removed wall with exposed wooden framing between two rooms, including a dining area with a table and chairs.
  • Floor plan with a red circle highlighting a wall between two rooms, questioning if the wall is load-bearing.
Most indications suggest that the wall is not load-bearing. It is definitely not constructed as such. However, one cannot be completely sure without additional info. It seems to be a house with a timber frame. The year of construction says a lot.
 
Okay. Thank you for the answer!
The year of construction is 1937 and it is a so-called egna-hem house.
 
There has probably been a wall there (or nearby) before, but this one is definitely not load-bearing. The load-bearing is on the heart walls running at a right angle to the current wall. If you look closely at the floor plan, you can deduce that information knowing that the construction year is 1937.
 
Why would they have such rough timber and also with a truss above the opening if it isn't load-bearing?

In which direction does the ridge run on the house?
What does the layout look like on the upper floor?
 
They didn't build like that in 1937. The wall was added later.
 
Thank you for your responses. The ridge runs right-left in the pictures. Attached are pictures of the basement and upper floor. (Apologies for the poor quality of the pictures)
 
  • Old architectural blueprint of the upper floor with visible damage and tape, showing layout and detailing from 1953.
  • Blueprint of a basement plan with labeled rooms including a garage, laundry, and storage, featuring dimensions and wall types, with some creases visible.
An old rule of thumb, especially for older houses, is that load-bearing walls run along the ridge, hence @Per_Eriksson's question.
 
The stair placement on the first floor plan hints at the ridge direction. In houses with plank frames, all partition walls built from planks should be considered load-bearing. The direction of the floor joists is often inconsistent precisely because there are plenty of walls that may be load-bearing. This house, through its small measurements, does not present any major span problems.
 
Seems like there's a cold attic up there? I would probably assume that the floor joists of the cold attic are joined over that wall; if so, you can't remove it without installing a beam. The ceiling is probably nailed directly into the floor joists judging by the picture. You likely don't have standard trusses in that house but rather two continuous beams up in the ceiling that follow the dotted lines?
 
It is a 1 1/2 story house with a finished basement. It has a cold attic, but it is minimal due to the number of floors. The upper floor has sloping ceilings.
I can't get up to the attic right now, but I can check tomorrow.
Above the planned opening is the "half floor" with bedrooms...
As mentioned, it's a detached house in Norra Ängby built in 1937 with a chimney in the middle of the house.
As mentioned, thank you for your involvement.
 
The houses in Norra Ängby are quite well-documented. See, for example, this link. http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:206879/FULLTEXT01 TS's house seems to belong to what is called house type IV. There, the wall in question was originally fitted with sliding doors so that it could be significantly opened up. This might explain why it has been remodeled. The upper floor has enhanced wall height and a rather flat external roof.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.