Hi, I have an idea to use 50mm foam plastic against an air gap instead of using 3mm oil-hardened board. Älvsbyhus uses a plastic instead of raw boards, so I'm a bit unsure.

The construction would be from outside to inside something like
Roof plastic - air gap 45mm - foam plastic 50mm - then crossed approximately 250mm glass wool insulation - vapor barrier - gypsum board.

Thoughts?
 
I would probably advise against it, as the foam plastic partially counteracts the purpose of the air gap.
 
You need to have a material that allows moisture to pass through, I'm unsure if the cellplast is sufficiently permeable. Additionally, it's a bit unwise to have cellplast there due to fire protection reasons.
 
F
J justusandersson said:
I would probably advise against it, as the foam board somewhat counters the purpose of the air gap.
Can you elaborate on that?
 
The cellular plastic is not diffusion-tight but diffusion-slow. In this way, it can help enclose organic material (parts of the rule construction) in a relatively vapor-tight layer. The air gap is needed because there are two diffusion seals surrounding the entire construction. Additionally, I share Daniel's point of view regarding the fire risk.
 
I don't know if I was unclear or if I'm misinterpreting the answer, I can understand the part about fire, so I should still have an air gap of about 45mm then according to älvsbyhus you should put a 3mm board, I was thinking instead of the board to put styrofoam panels that are 50mm. The board that's supposed to be there according to the plan, is there such a big difference in how much air it lets through? I mean that board is oil-treated so it should almost be tighter.
 
It's not about air tightness but about water vapor tightness. There's a big difference.
 
K
Such discussions appear frequently. I think you could use frigolit if you are not worried about the fire risk. Sure, it is probably somewhat more vapor-tight, but the difference compared to the vapor barrier on the inside is still very large.
 
F
J justusandersson said:
The cell plastic is not diffusion-tight but rather diffusion-resistant. It can thus help to enclose organic material (parts of the frame structure) in a relatively vapor-tight layer. The air gap is needed because there are two diffusion seals surrounding the entire construction. Also, I share Daniel's viewpoint regarding the fire risk.
Now, as mentioned, there was never any question of not having an air gap.

I also don't understand the purpose of EPS, is it for a little better insulation or what is the purpose?

Personally, I would use this instead https://www.byggmax.se/skivmaterial/byggskivor/plywood-och-osb/trossbottenskiva-p07040

I also agree about the fire risk with cell plastic. Whole roofs are sold in cell plastic, completely unacceptable.
 
The purpose is that since I still have to use a board, in order to reduce the workload and cost, I'll use cellplast instead of masonite.
 
I believe that fire risk should be taken seriously. Once you've seen what a fire in cellplast can cause, you don't want to experience it again. Especially the combination with plastic as a sealing layer on the roof makes it advisable to avoid cellplast. A spark from a fire in the yard that gets under the roof tiles, burns through the plastic, and lands on the styrofoam is not an entirely unthinkable scenario.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.