Today we met the construction manager on site to discuss the stairs. Unfortunately, we didn't get any wiser. The only thing we could ascertain when the construction manager showed the drawings was that the stairs were drawn this way already in the floor plan. Absolutely nothing we could have discovered if he hadn't pointed it out, and he agreed with that.

Now I'm expecting an explanation from Myresjöhus (and maybe Snickarlaget) tomorrow. Unfortunately, my feeling now is that, as several of you are saying... a mistake.
 
  • Wooden staircase with metal railings inside a house, leading down to a lower floor. The placement appears to be a concern in a construction discussion.
And then the inevitable question arises:
Who should take responsibility for the blunder?
 
Yes, it didn't turn out well, that would have to be redone, I would be bothered by it until I became crazy motivated to build something better myself.
 
If it was indeed marked on the drawing, then it surely could have been discovered? Now, I don't know how Myresjöhus does certain things, but when I built with LB-hus, I had to approve and sign all the drawings before anything went into production. Of course, it requires knowing how to read a drawing to understand everything, but if you're going to sign something, I believe you should also know what you're signing. Now, I work in the construction industry, so I can read a drawing, which was fortunate because we found several things on the drawings that needed to be changed to suit us or that were simply incorrectly drawn.
 
I can agree with others that it doesn't look right! Waiting eagerly for the follow-up..
 
why don't I see any double railings? Up there, there must be an ascending railing and a fall protection. How would you solve it otherwise?
gaia
 
How do you mean gaia? It could be railing, but you might not need all the spindles down to the stringer...

Edit: Addition: when building the staircase to the right width, that is...
 
Last edited:
You will probably have to wait for the follow-up... Myresjöhus cannot say anything yet, but they are having internal discussions. Everyone involved that I've talked to has questioned the solution chosen. I hope that Myresjöhus takes responsibility and makes sure to address this somehow. So far, they have been very understanding of our views.
 
jhenrikj said:
If it was marked on the drawing, then it could certainly have been detected? Now, I don't know how Myresjöhus does certain things, but when I built with LB-hus, I had to approve and sign all the drawings before anything went into production. Of course, you need to know how to read a drawing to understand everything, but if you're going to sign something, I think you should also know what you're signing. I work in the construction industry, so I can read a drawing, which was lucky because we found several things on the drawings that we had to change in order for it to fit us or were simply misdrawn.
We have a similar staircase from the carpentry team, but ours connects directly to the wall without a gap, and we don’t have double railings, only a handrail in the staircase. Out of curiosity, I looked at our drawings, and there is no visible difference between the railing on the upper floor and the handrail in the staircase; on the drawing, it looks like the same, but obviously, we have received different ones, so I think it’s doubtful if one could have detected it on the drawing, and that it is TS's responsibility. Additionally, it is quite obviously the wrong staircase ordered/delivered, and to demand that the customer should react to it among hundreds of details is a bit much.

Somewhere along the line, one must assume that the seller and the house manufacturer know which staircase is being ordered and that it fits the selected floor plan, and if it happens that they think the customer wants gaps and double railings instead of a normal solution, then they should probably ask clearly before drawing something like that. The carpentry team has probably just delivered what was ordered. Otherwise, it should be very easy to sort out with the help of the order from Myresjöhus.
 
Gaia: I don't know why you can't see any double railings, on my computer they are clearly visible, and as the person responsible for staircase cleaning, I just have to say it can't look like that. The railing on the stairs must be removed, and if they refuse to install a proper staircase, the hole must be covered properly, so that dust and lost items don't get stuck in the gap. We had such a gap but only 2 cm wide in our staircase, poorly covered with a lsit, and it was NOT fun to see what was behind it when we took down the staircase this summer.

I also see they haven't covered the joists yet, how do they plan to make that look nice when the railing is in place?
 
Anna_H said:
I see that they also haven't covered the bjälklaget yet, how do they plan to do it nicely when the railing is already in place?
.:D.
 
Yes, it really becomes interesting. Even if the staircase looks like that now, you can really wonder why the railing was screwed in before the wall was completed.
 
Fixing the wall is no problem. When my husband visited the house, it turned out that they had actually put up the molding on the wall. Check out the pictures.

What we don't understand is why it was done before we agreed on what to do with the staircase...
 
  • Staircase with wooden handrail and metal balusters, alongside a newly added wall trim, possibly before renovating the stairs.
One more picture
 
  • Wooden staircase under construction in a room with white walls and a small window above. Building materials are visible on the floor.
gaia said:
why do I not see any double railings? Up there must be a rising railing and a fall protection. How else would you solve it?
gaia
You only have a handrail on the stairs if there is already a railing? In the TS case, there is railing both on the stairs and a railing as fall protection.
Surely you see that, gaia? ;)
 
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.