Demolition of 19th-century house

[Valtraa92]

Wondering if one can demolish an older residential house in the countryside and bury the demolition wood and foundation? Without risking any consequences from the municipality? Of course, a demolition notification should be filed,

 

[Andreas_kalmar]

If you're planning to file a demolition notification, that's probably a very bad idea. So no, you should not/may not bury demolition wood; why not take it to the dump?

 

[Valtraa92]

If you are going to make a demolition notification, it's probably a very bad idea. So no, you should/must not bury demolition wood, why not take it to the dump?

The reason I don't want to dispose of clean wood is that it would cost 150,000 SEK and I have 200 hectares without neighbors and my own excavator. But if the law says so, of course, I'll do it.

 

[kest]

Easter bonfire? The fire department sometimes wants practice houses to train on.

 

[useless]

You're likely to get the best answer if you ask the municipality... Along with the demolition notice, you need to submit a plan for how the waste will be managed, specifying the types of waste, approximate volumes, and any hazardous waste. If you write that you will take it to the dump but instead bury it, you will likely encounter problems. But the municipality might accept a plan that involves depositing clean stone and wood locally? Otherwise, you can write that the wood will be saved for reuse, and then you can pile it up in some secluded part of the property...

 

[Valtraa92]

Easter bonfire?
The fire department sometimes wants practice houses to train on.

Heard from the fire department the other day but they had changed the rules in the municipality a few years ago so it is no longer granted, a bit of a shame.

 

[Valtraa92]

You'll probably get the best answer if you ask the municipality...
Along with the demolition notification, you should submit a plan for how the waste will be managed, specifying the different types of waste, approximate volumes, and any hazardous waste. If you write that you will take it to the dump but instead bury it, you'll likely have problems.
But perhaps the municipality will accept a plan that involves depositing clean stone and wood locally?
Otherwise, you need to state that the wood will be saved for reuse, so you place it in a pile in some secluded part of the property...

Yes, I thought it sounded terribly expensive to deposit wood in a container, when the whole house consists of a timber frame with thick planks in the floor trusses, and the roof is made of timber logs. I understand the need to deposit painted wood, e-waste, and radiator pipes along with various sanitary items. Do you think they'll accept if you state that the wood is intended for firewood? I use firewood for heating in two of my other houses.

 

[kest]

If you have 200 hectares, you might as well pile up in a secluded place for future reuse.
In the best ecological spirit

 

[Lutte]

An old father-in-law tore down his house after they built a new one, it was a run-down log cabin. All the timber went to a brother-in-law who burned it in his wood boiler. The neighbor took the sawdust and burned it in his chip/sawdust boiler.

So it should be possible to at least specify that it should be burned in the boiler, then if you burn it all in a big bonfire after tearing it down, that's another thing.

 

[Valtraa92]

If you have 200 hectares, you can probably pile it up in a secluded place for future reuse.
In the best ecological spirit

Yes, I will most likely do that, just thinking about how the municipality views where I dispose of the demolition waste, since I'm going to build a new house in the same place, I don't want to do anything that risks causing problems.

 

[Valtraa92]

An old father-in-law tore down his house after they built a new one, it was a shabby timber house.
All the timber went to a brother-in-law who burned it in his wood-fired boiler. The neighbor took the sawdust and burned it in his wood chip/sawdust boiler.

So, I'm sure it's possible to at least write that it should be burned in the boiler, then if you burn it all in a big bonfire after tearing it down, that's another matter.

Yes indeed, I also think it should be doable, I have no neighbors within 3km who might be bothered by it, thinking along the same lines.

 

[kest]

If you have 200 hectares, you could set up a pile in a secluded place for future reuse.
In the best ecological spirit

200 hectares. Then it's a commercial property. You can reuse all the material for buildings you have or plan to build as only the main building requires a building permit. Agricultural buildings for the business are exempt.
It's not illegal to be a bad businessman and make misjudged investments.

 

[Valtraa92]

200 hectares. Then it's a commercial property. You can reuse all material for buildings you have or will build since only the main building requires a building permit. Agricultural buildings related to the business are exempt.
It's not illegal to be a bad businessman and make poor investments.

Yes indeed, it is a commercial property, with two barns at 480 sqm and 375 sqm, plus 4 agricultural buildings, there you mentioned a really good thing I hadn't thought of.

 

[kest]

Hope you are keeping the invoices separate now, because only the invoices related to economic buildings are deductible. Those related to the residence are not. If you happen to be building on both.

 

[Fotografen]

Chop up the skiten for ve'...