Hi,

We are considering buying a house where they have most likely removed a load-bearing wall and replaced it with a beam that is too weak, which has caused it to bend (see attached image).

My thought is to remove the beam and build a load-bearing interior wall instead.

I understand it's impossible to give an exact answer based on an image, but what could this imply? Could building a load-bearing interior wall be sufficient, or could this have affected something beyond the beam, such as rafters etc.?

What could a rough cost estimate be to address this? The beam is approximately 4 meters long.

A slightly bent beam in a white ceiling, indicating possible structural issues from a removed load-bearing wall in a home interior.

Best regards,
Henrik
 
Mats-S
From the picture, it seems like there's a significant settlement, but maybe the picture "lies" a little... guessing about 2-3 cm settlement otherwise? It seems like they haven't used a glulam beam but only regular planks, or possibly a beam that's too weak. If that's the case, it should be fixable by replacing the beam with one that has the correct load-bearing capacity.

Is there another floor above, or an attic with roof trusses?

If there are roof trusses directly above resting on the beam, then check the roof as well; it's likely settled too. But it should "correct itself" when you install a proper beam.

If there's a floor above, some movements in doors and walls will occur, but that can be fixed with "cosmetic" adjustments :-)

But take my reasoning here as speculation; it needs to be seen in person to give a relevant answer on actions. The cost is difficult to comment on (depends a lot on what you can manage yourself), but if a new beam is all that's needed, it should be manageable.

Try to get someone knowledgeable on site who can check and give a bit more information than I can :-)
 
Thanks for the quick feedback!

Well, that's probably quite close to the truth, I would guess it's a matter of a few centimeters as you wrote. :)

There is an attic above, so the rafters rest on the beam. The roof was snow-covered now, so it was difficult to determine if it had also settled, but it seems quite likely as you mentioned.

The plan is to build a load-bearing interior wall instead of the beam. Then you might need to push up the "roof" with the studs in the load-bearing interior wall.
 
A reasonable deflection for a 4 m span is 1/300, i.e., 13 mm. It's a bit odd that the trusses cause such a significant deflection if the attic is unfinished. The year of construction can explain a lot, photos from the attic can explain much.
 
Aha okay!

Yes, it's really strange, I took a quick look at the attic during the viewing and it's unfinished. The only thing on top of the beam besides the rafters and the roof is sawdust insulation and a narrow plank walkway.

The house was built in 1964.
 
Did you see if it was a regular truss or a truss with a framework? What is the snow zone?
 
J justusandersson said:
Did you see if it was a regular truss or one with lattice? What is the snow zone?
Hello again,

Sorry for the late response. We decided not to proceed with the house.

Thanks for the help!

Best regards,
Henrik
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.