Member
· Västernorrland
· 12 030 posts
Yes, it makes no difference. The differences are still debated........
Why should there be special filler in a wet room?
Member
· Västernorrland
· 12 030 posts
Has anyone experienced a concrete case where insurance companies have backed down because it wasn't used in wet rooms? It is claimed to be more water-resistant, but is there any putty that is?...........Someone mentioned mold-resistant, but why would the putty mold specifically?
There's no doubt that it's more water-resistant. And when it comes to insurance, it can come down to the producer requiring a complete system for a guarantee.S Stefan1972 said:
There should be no water in the wall. If the filler is damaged by the water, you already have water damage.
Yes.
I think it's been about four years exactly.mexitegel said:
The agency warns against waterproof boards due to health risks. I'm not well-versed enough in this specific area to know why, but often the warnings they issue are justified. Although sometimes it might be a little exaggerated...
Click here to reply