When installing underfloor heating in a spaced board according to Uponor's method (image), half of the spaced board ends without the support of joists. The idea is then to have chipboard on top and then any floor of choice.

Isn't there a risk that the floor will flex when there is no support everywhere? Do you need to customize the measurements so that the joints in the chipboard don't land on the spaced boards that have no support, or does it not matter? I see a risk that during installation, a smaller piece of chipboard might end up on these unsupported spaced boards, and it could be quite difficult to predict beforehand where they would end up.
 
  • Wooden floorboards arranged with gaps for underfloor heating installation using Uponor's method.
  • A person installs underfloor heating pipes on a joist system using Uponor's method, highlighting potential issues with support and flooring stability.
Anyone have thoughts on the placement of hoses in the pictures? What I'm wondering is if it matters that two sparse panels between the full-length ones will be unsupported if you have floor chipboard on top later anyway? Adding another stud under the short ones is tricky. And if you only use full-length panels, it seems incredibly cumbersome to roll out the hose coil and pull it under.

What do you think about placing a sparse panel lengthwise under the long ones and screwing them together for the short ones to rest on?
 
Last edited:
It is not the boards that are supposed to stiffen the chipboard flooring, but obviously the beams underneath that are load-bearing. So in principle, the boards can be laid with support on the same CC as the beams.
 
  • Like
nics and 1 other
  • Laddar…
Thank you for your response. I didn't quite understand your last sentence, but are you thinking that as long as the floor chipboards are supported on the beams, it doesn't matter how the sparse panel lies underneath?
 
G gluecifer said:
Thank you for the response. I didn't quite understand your last sentence, but are you saying that as long as the chipboard has support on the beams, it doesn't matter how the sparsely nailed planks are positioned underneath?
If you had placed the chipboard on the beams, it would have had support on CC 600 mm (usually).
If you had laid boards on CC 600 mm across the floor beams and then the chipboard, the chipboard wouldn't rest on the beams, but it still gets support right down through the boards on CC 600 mm.
Therefore, it doesn't really matter that there are two boards in between with no support on anything at all.
 
You're right about that, of course. Got caught up in the thoughts that they were supported by the boards :)
But where the boards are supported by the beams, it should be pretty stable then.
 
  • Like
C.Lundin
  • Laddar…
Are you really going to lay chipboard on top of the spacing, I might misunderstand you but if that's the case, think again....
Then it's better to lay grooved chipboard and place the pipes in!
 
  • Like
Träbyggaren
  • Laddar…
Yes, it turned out that I had a 20mm hose and to get the heights right, it had to be spaced out. I am aware of the inertia that it will cause...
 
Then run your gles all the way without cuts, and also lay out sawn strips of golvspån is my suggestion!
 
It works excellently with spaced boards and chips on top. I have that + floating floor and tiles on top, and it works great. But with a 20mm hose, you won't have any issues with the flow.
 
  • Like
gluecifer
  • Laddar…
It's possible to make it much more complicated if one wishes... If the floor joists themselves have sufficient dimensions to meet deflection requirements, it doesn't matter what you place on top or in what order. Simply put, the deflection requirements mean that a 100 kg (actually 1kN) person standing in the middle of a beam should lead to a momentary deflection of no more than 1.5 mm regardless of the beam's span. If the floor joists' dimensions are somewhat insufficient, one needs the help of a floor-covering material (usually chipboard), glued and screwed, to achieve acceptable deflection. In that case, grooved chipboards are hardly suitable.
 
Depending on where you live, it might be worthwhile to consider pests like mice and rats. If there's a risk they could get in, they might attack the hoses. Perhaps unlikely, but a water leak from the heating system within the flooring during a cold winter isn't a risk I want to take.

I myself have chosen to place the particle board at the bottom (standard 22 mm), with the battens on top. Then a solid wood floor (15 mm parquet works too). It works just as well, but I have the hoses inside a sealed construction, less inertia, and it's easier to lay hoses in the meantime. If you also lay the hoses "room by room," meaning not under the walls, you can, if you have a damage to a hose, lift up the surface layer and repair/replace the hose. And you can regulate the temperature per room.
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.