2,206 views ·
5 replies
2k views
5 replies
Increase the strength of load-bearing structures
If you want to increase the load-bearing capacity of a wall, is it better to reduce CC from 60 to 30 or double up the studs?
Instinctively, it seems like CC 30 must provide more strength than doubling the studs at CC 60. That was my plan from the start, but then a colleague said doubling the studs was best, and I became uncertain.
The timber is 28x70 if that matters.
Instinctively, it seems like CC 30 must provide more strength than doubling the studs at CC 60. That was my plan from the start, but then a colleague said doubling the studs was best, and I became uncertain.
The timber is 28x70 if that matters.
Best answer
Member
· Blekinge
· 10 117 posts
What determines the load-bearing capacity of posts (i.e., standing studs) is the risk of so-called buckling (i.e., bending). Therefore, two screwed-together studs are stiffer in the weaker direction than the corresponding studs on closer c/c. In that respect, your colleague is correct. However, 28x70 is not a suitable dimension for a post.
Is it common to consider the buckling-preventing effect of the panels (gypsum/OSB/plyfa)?J justusandersson said:What determines the load-bearing capacity of posts (i.e. standing studs) is the risk of so-called buckling (i.e. bending). Two screwed-together studs are therefore stiffer in the weak direction than corresponding studs on a tighter c/c. In that sense, your colleague is right. However, 28x70 is not a suitable dimension as a post.
Member
· Blekinge
· 10 117 posts
Fully aware that the timber is too weak to support anything, hence this thread.
It will be used for a temporary shed that will (hopefully) stand for only 2-3 years.
They will not support a floor, just a simple roof for the shed.
We have a lot of spare paneling left over that needs to be removed anyway.
It will be used for a temporary shed that will (hopefully) stand for only 2-3 years.
They will not support a floor, just a simple roof for the shed.
I wouldn't even dare to use 45*70 for a load-bearing interior wall.Tomture61 said:
We have a lot of spare paneling left over that needs to be removed anyway.
Click here to reply
