As the question states.

I have a situation where parts of a floor structure are CC60, but other parts, for various reasons, have slightly varying widths.

If I have to place all the joints on joists, I will have to make 4 long continuous joints across the entire width of the floor (approx. 6x4m).

I imagine it would be better to avoid a continuous joint and, if necessary, place a horizontal 120-regel or something similar underneath to reinforce the "floating joint."

It's a mid-floor structure, so I have no problem accessing it from underneath before I install the sparse.

Cholera or Plague? Continuous joint or Floating joint?
 
It is okay to splice in the field as long as you do not splice in the same compartment.
 
  • Like
David_Berglund
  • Laddar…
Matti_75 Matti_75 said:
It is okay to splice in the field as long as you don't splice in the same compartment
Aha, OK!

Yes, then this must be preferable compared to a general splice, I guess?

Moreover, there are thinner compartments with just 45CC in some places, etc., so if you also place the splice there, there will be even less overhang.
 
First, you need to check what type of floor chipboard you have. Some manufacturers allow joints "in the air" while others require them on a beam.
 
  • Like
Tjrex
  • Laddar…
Are you sure you don't have self-supporting floor chipboards that don't need to be joined on a joist?
 
I have Forestia and when I read their instructions, it actually states that they may be spliced in the field, as Matti wrote.. So that's the answer to that.

It also states that they should be laid in a pattern, which I assume refers to overlapping..

So I consider the question answered, and moreover with the answer that gives me the least extra work..
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.