I have a garage that was originally built with a flat roof. In 1999, the garage was remodeled by raising the roof to a 27-degree slope to match the house.
The new roof trusses were placed on top of the old roof joists. The old roof joists are 220 cm above the floor and have dimensions of 45x220. They are spliced in the middle against a transverse roof joist. See image:
The garage has an interior depth of 6 meters, i.e., between the load-bearing walls, it is C/C 6200mm with a pillar in the middle of the garage. A simple plan sketch:
I want to remove this pillar and gain some extra ceiling height. Therefore, my thought is to completely remove the old flat roof. The only joists I believe I need to keep are those where the walls support the new roof trusses.
Namely, the following two joists:
This one where I wrote 'wall' on the transverse joist of the old roof (and the one outside the garage as well)
This one against the back of the garage:
The roof trusses have the following dimensions: Length 10 meters
Top chord 45x140
Bottom chord 45x140
Brace (in the truss) 45x95
I have googled a bit and concluded that in my snow zone 1.5, my roof trusses are self-supporting up to a 10-meter span. So it seems I have good margins as it is built today. I should also be able to remove the old flat roof without risk and hopefully, in the future, move the wall with the doors outward to get a deeper garage.
What do you think?
The following are more images to describe more how the garage looks (sorry for the mess):
Probably true, but keep an eye on the walls to ensure they don't buckle outward where there are no supports if there is a lot of snow. Possibly, a horizontal 45 x 220 (you have plenty of that dimension) on top of the wall, bridging the distance between the complete roof trusses, may be good.
Less work and cheaper.
Since I'm not going to raise the entire roof, this method feels simpler. Also, I don't want it open up to the ridge, and I don't need to install posts for the beam to stand on.
Now, I am really not a roof truss designer, but it feels like the lower chord would need reinforcement when it is moved up. There will be more pressure on it from the upper chord because the framework becomes less(?) effective.
Yes, it will be done. I will place a 220 rule alongside the overhangs, and when I have cut the old underlay, I will also move it up to between the overhangs. The 220 rule will be bolted through the overhang.
My friend did this on his barn roof and it still stands after many years, and it's both larger and more loaded.
Less work and cheaper. Since I'm not raising the entire roof, this method feels easier. Additionally, I don't want it open up to the ridge, and I don't need to install posts for the beam.
My first impression was that the price difference wouldn't be significant, but after giving it more thought, you're probably right. Besides, it will be "easier" as you point out. I assume you're considering a wide door in the future since you don't want posts. I think you've thought this through well
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.