Hi!

I've started renovating the laundry room, tidied up the ceiling and walls. The house is from the 1970s with a basement. I will need to sand down the concrete floor in the laundry room as it was coated with some kind of epoxy paint many years ago that has now begun to crack due to the small amount of moisture coming from below.
I will rent a floor grinder from a local rental company and have a friend lay the tiles.

Do I need to replace the drain? I was planning to save some money... The drain is cast iron and not very attractive, but the space is only used as a laundry room and only water from the washing machine goes down there.

Would you spend 3-5000:- to replace the darn thing or just lay tiles and leave it be?

The laundry room is in the basement.
 
Otherwise, the renovation won't be worth a cent at future resale. Then the well rusts and starts leaking water here and there, making the renovation wasted anyway. Do it right from the start and avoid the headache later (y)
 
  • Like
mbrt and 1 other
  • Laddar…
If it becomes an insurance issue, the insurance company may argue that it was not done according to the rules that applied at the time of the renovation (if the current well does not meet the regulations). So I would replace it.
 
I think it is impossible for a cast iron well to meet Boverket's regulations today during renovation, the standard in the industry is always to replace.
 
Everything probably depends on what you mean by renovation as well. I don't see tidying up a bit, painting, and laying tiles as a renovation that suggests anything more. As long as you know how it is, it doesn't matter, but if you're selling and claiming it's completely renovated, then you're off track. But for my own part, I wouldn't replace the well just because it's normally done during complete renovations.
 
If you're going to spend the time laying new tiles, I would replace the floor drain; it's not a big expense and you'll avoid the problem of fitting it against the tiles and ensure it won't cause issues in a few years.
 
Rent a car machine and buy a well and some elbow grease, and it's done for under a thousand kronor. (y)
 
However, new clinker today is not worse than a bucket of wall paint in cost if you just want to tidy up. That's what I meant. You have to draw the line somewhere. It would be different if you were laying a marble floor or something that you don't intend to tear up at all.
 
Regardless, I would have driven up and replaced the well. The room is not waterproofed today and will not be after either, so many of the rules for what should/must be done do not apply anyway.

But, sure, it would be nice to have one less thing to worry about. It’s not about more than a thousand in material costs and a few hours of work.
 
If the entire avloppsgroda is made of cast iron, it feels a bit silly to just replace the well... Either you ignore replacing anything at all, with the potential future problems, or you replace the whole groda = all drains in tvst.
 
If the house is from the 70s, then the pipes are plastic. There is no reason to tackle more than the floor drain then.
 
pacman42 pacman42 said:
If the house is from the 70s, the pipes are plastic. There is no reason to touch more than the floor drain then.
As I wrote...IF the other drains are also cast iron!
I've demolished many bathrooms from the early 70s with the entire floor drainage in cast iron, even though plastic is the most common!
 
What difference does it make if it's cast iron or plastic... the plastic pipes from the 70s are crap and should be replaced...
 
A Alltoinget said:
What does it matter if it's cast iron or plastic.. the plastic pipes from the 70s are rubbish and should be replaced..
Why?? In my house from 1971, I have black welded plastic pipes. I removed some due to a well replacement. The black "crappy pipes" from 1971 were completely flawless, significantly tougher than today's ground pipes. They'll last another 100 years without any issues.
 
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.