Hello, I am working on a project where I need to open holes in an outer wall and switch out three rafters for a laminated beam 90x315 supported by two laminated posts 90x90. The idea is for the underside of the laminated beam to be at the same height as the underside of the rafters, the rafters' "eave overhang" will be cut, and the rafters will be attached to the beam "from the side" using a joist hanger and a couple of substantial wood screws through the beam into the end grain of the rafter. The beam carries nothing but the three rafters and its own weight.

Now to my question: To facilitate later stages of the project, I would like to reduce the height of one corner of the beam (with about a 30-degree angle as the red line in the sketch). Does that part have any load-bearing function? How much (if any) can be cut without affecting the beam's function?
 
  • Sketch showing a lintel beam supported by two columns, with a red line indicating a proposed cut at a 30-degree angle on one corner of the beam.
L Laban said:
Hello, I'm working on a project where I plan to open a hole in an exterior wall and replace three rafters with a glulam beam 90x315, supported by two glulam posts 90x90. The idea is for the underside of the glulam beam to align with the underside of the rafters. The "eaves overhang" of the rafters will be cut, and the rafters will be attached to the beam "from the side" using joist hangers and a couple of sturdy wood screws through the beam into the end grain of the rafter. The beam carries nothing other than the three rafters and its own weight.

Now to my question: To facilitate later stages of the project, I would like to reduce the height of one corner of the beam (by about a 30-degree angle as the red line in the sketch). Does that part have any load-bearing function? How much (if any) can be cut without affecting the beam's function?
I would be more concerned about the rafters "hanging" on the side of the beam. If there's no load on these 3 rafters, then it's fine.

Regarding the beam's function, I have no idea :P
 
It is impossible to answer the question without looking at the calculations of the beam. The rafters must be attached with brackets, you cannot attach them with screws into the end grain.
 
This is what the rough calculation for the beam looks like. I understand that it's not possible to calculate this exactly, but I was more interested in getting a theoretical idea if the upper corner has any function based on how the forces are distributed in the beam, maybe someone knowledgeable here can comment in general terms. I will not do anything "in real life" without having checked the solutions with an engineer.
 
  • Illustration of a house design with measurements and specifications including snow load, roof slope, and structural beam details.
You write that the beam is only supposed to support itself and the trusses.

Is it only for decoration?
Otherwise, shouldn't there be additional load?
 
The supports and the center of the beam are normally the sensitive parts of a beam. The beam's ability to withstand shear forces, which occur at the supports, depends on its cross-sectional area. 90x315 can handle a shear force of about 36 kN, 90x180 about 21 kN. How much you can cut the beam therefore depends on the total loads it needs to handle.
 
  • Like
Nicklas Karlsson and 1 other
  • Laddar…
L Laban said:
I understand that it's not possible to calculate this exactly
On the contrary, it is absolutely possible to calculate this exactly.
 
  • Like
kest
  • Laddar…
P Pappa1986 said:
I would have been more worried if the rafters "hang" on the side of the beam, if there is no load on these 3 rafters then it's fine.

Regarding the beam's function, I have no idea :p
Mja, I don't know. When I say "hang," I mean that the rafter (red in the image below) does not stand on the beam (black in the image below) but is attached from the side. For this, I understand that a suitable fitting is necessary, like a substantial joist hanger, possibly even some type of hanger strap.
 
  • Red roof trusses attached from the side to a black beam, illustrating a construction method needing appropriate brackets like joist hangers.
Dowser4711 Dowser4711 said:
You write that the beam should only bear itself and the roof trusses.

Is it purely decorative?
Otherwise, shouldn't there be additional load?
Sorry if I was unclear, I mean that the roof trusses only bear themselves and what they currently support, that is a part of the house's roof and anything that might accumulate on the roof when it snows.
 
W witten said:
On the contrary, it is absolutely possible to calculate this precisely.
Of course, it will be possible to calculate it precisely, but what I meant is that at the moment I don't have the exact measurements of where on the beam the trusses will be placed.
 
  • Like
witten
  • Laddar…
Sorry misunderstood
 
  • Like
Laban
  • Laddar…
I haven't calculated at all. But intuitively, that corner shouldn't affect the strength at all.
 
  • Like
Leif i Skåne
  • Laddar…
L Laban said:
Hi ...
Now to my question: In order to facilitate later stages in the project, I would like to reduce the height of one corner of the beam (with about a 30-degree angle as the red line in the sketch). Does that part have any load-bearing function? How much (if any) can be cut without affecting the beam's function?
As Justus says, a certain cross-sectional area in the material of the beam at the support point is needed to handle shear forces. Theoretically, one could compensate for the cross-sectional area that is cut away by adding material to the sides and making the beam wider at the support, which would also reduce the pressure on the bearing surface.
 
  • Like
justusandersson
  • Laddar…
J justusandersson said:
The supports and the middle of the beam are normally the sensitive parts of a beam. The beam's ability to handle shear forces, which occur at the supports, is dependent on its cross-sectional area. 90x315 can handle a shear force of about 36 kN, 90x180 about 21 kN. How much you can cut from the beam thus depends on how large the loads it needs to handle are overall.
OK. Can one compare the shear force with the support reaction in the calculation example from byggbeskrivningar.se above in the thread? There it states a support reaction of about 15 kN so if you can compare that figure with the shear force, you might be able to cut away perhaps half the beam's height?
 
D Daniel 109 said:
I haven't calculated at all. But intuitively that corner shouldn't affect the strength at all.
No, my intuition also went in that direction, but I've learned that intuition doesn't always work so well. In this particular case, I really want to have the weakest possible beam with as much cut-off corner as possible. When I use my intuition, it usually ends with over-dimensioning.
 
  • Like
Leif i Skåne
  • Laddar…
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.