Hello!

We are planning to take down the wall between the kitchen and the living room and are unsure whether it is load-bearing or not. We had a carpenter on-site who concluded with a maybe and would investigate further. Do you have any opinion on the matter? Should I contact a structural engineer? Is there a digital solution where you can send drawings, or does it always require a site visit? We have carpenters who can help us with support if needed, but it would be nice to avoid it.

Thanks for the help!
 
  • Blueprint showing section of a house with measurements and structural details, used to determine if a kitchen-living room wall is load-bearing.
  • Blueprint showing a house floor plan with kitchen, living room, and other rooms labeled; used to assess if a wall is load-bearing.
  • Floor plan showing the kitchen and living room with a red-marked wall. Discussion about whether this wall is load-bearing.
  • Architectural blueprint showing structural details and measurements for a house renovation project, including potential load-bearing walls between the kitchen and living room.
Absolutely believe it's load-bearing, you have a corresponding wall in the basement.
 
  • Like
SågspånPappspikEternit and 1 other
  • Laddar…
Purre
Violina Violina said:
I absolutely think it is load-bearing, you have an equivalent wall in the basement
And it goes straight through the entire house.
 
Yes, it is load-bearing - this is mainly evident from the fact that the slab is reinforced underneath it. Hire a structural engineer.

Structural engineers often want to see it on-site, especially in older houses and if drawings are missing. But simpler measures can sometimes be handled remotely.

It's a bit difficult to see in the pictures, how large do you expect the opening to be?
 
  • Like
Purre
  • Laddar…
Walle85
Violina Violina said:
I absolutely believe it is load-bearing, you have the corresponding wall in the basement
That's not true for everyone, at least not in the walk-out basement house we have.
Apologies for the low resolution, but the width of the house itself is about 8 m (between the outer walls on which the roof trusses rest). We have been able to remove the middle wall on the upper floor without any problem.
Cross-section diagram of a two-story house showing floor heights and structural walls, used to discuss load-bearing walls in a renovation project.
One way to get a hint is to feel if the studs in the wall are tight or easy to loosen. If they sit loosely without any pressure from the roof trusses, then it is likely not a problem to remove them. But if they are tight, it may very well be that they are load-bearing. Note that I am referring to the upper floor, the one on the lower level is definitely load-bearing.
 
  • Like
mexitegel
  • Laddar…
Walle85 Walle85 said:
Not true for everyone, at least not in the suterränghus we have.
Apologies for the low resolution, but the width of the house itself is about 8 m (between the exterior walls that the roof trusses rest on). We have been able to remove the central wall on the upper floor without any problem.
[image]
One way to get a hint is to feel if the studs in the wall are tight or easy to loosen. If they are loose without any pressure from the roof trusses, then it's likely not a problem to remove them. But if they are tight, it could very well be that they are load-bearing. Note that I am referring to the upper floor, the one on the lower floor is definitely load-bearing.
And who calculated that?

What snow load did you have on the roof when you checked if the studs were "loose"?
 
  • Like
BirgitS
  • Laddar…
Walle85 Walle85 said:
Doesn't apply to everyone, at least not in the split-level house we have.
Excuse the low resolution, but the width of the house itself is about 8 m (between the outer walls that the roof trusses rest on). We have been able to remove the middle wall on the upper floor without any problems.
[image]
One way to get a hint is to feel if the studs in the wall are clamped or are easy to loosen. If they sit loosely without any pressure from the roof trusses, then it's likely not a problem to remove them. But if they are clamped, it could very well be that they are load-bearing. Note that I'm referring to the upper floor, the one on the lower floor is guaranteed to be load-bearing.
Thanks! Good and very logical tip.
 
It also says on the drawing "kortlas under bärande vägg" so it's very easy to check.
 
  • Like
BirgitS
  • Laddar…
Oh, I just realized I mistook the basement for the entrance floor. Disregard my post.

The trusses suggest that it is not a load-bearing wall, but their span is long, so it should be checked. It is primarily the snow load that is troublesome. You cannot determine this by seeing if the saw binds when cutting into them.

Is there a drawing of the trusses?
 
  • Like
BirgitS
  • Laddar…
Walle85
Violina Violina said:
And who calculated that?

What was the snow load on the roof when you checked if the joists "were loose"?
Nothing I calculated, conversations with the previous owner and neighbors with similar houses. Then a bit of common sense and the knowledge that it was 70s original wall modules with spliced joists at several points in height and their thickness (or lack thereof). I sleep peacefully anyway 😉
 
BirgitS
C cola88 said:
Thanks! Good and very logical tip.
It's only logical if you check for pressure when there's a maximum amount of wet snow on the roof.

Another thing to consider is that during one decade (the 80s?), many roofs collapsed in a snowy winter because the snow zone map was incorrect, which had led to a lot of truss roofs being under-dimensioned.
 
A
As already pointed out:

Hand-drawn building blueprint with red circle highlighting specific measurements and notes.
 
  • Like
Henkan Sundberg
  • Laddar…
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.