Opened up a wall in the kitchen down to the studs and want to remove them as well. I've decided that this wall is not load-bearing, but I'm wondering if any of you see any indications that it might be? I understand it's difficult to answer without a construction drawing (which I don't have) but those of you with more experience definitely see things I don't.

Here's what I'm thinking:
Gaps between the studs and the top plate should indicate that there is no load on the studs except from the top plate.
Fairly large grooves have been routed into one of the studs to run a cable to a thermostat that was mounted on the wall.
Different ages of the studs, which indicates that it has been built on over time.
Opened kitchen wall showing wooden beams and studs, with visible gaps and cable slots indicating potential non-load-bearing structure. An open kitchen wall reveals wooden studs and electrical wiring; a blue toolbox is on the floor amid construction debris. A close-up view of opened kitchen wall with exposed wooden studs, highlighting visible gaps and cuts for wiring, suggesting non-load-bearing structure. Wooden ceiling joists exposed, with a beam partially supporting the ceiling. Chips and gaps in wood visible, suggesting a non-load-bearing wall removal. Exposed wooden studs and header in a partially demolished kitchen wall, showing gaps and modifications, questioning if the wall is load-bearing. Close-up of a wooden stud and hammer beam in a partially demolished kitchen wall. Visible gaps and wear on the wood indicate modifications over time. A wooden stud in a kitchen wall with gaps above, showing removed drywall and wiring, suggesting non-load-bearing based on construction details. A wooden stud with large grooves cut into it for cable routing, part of a non-load-bearing kitchen wall under renovation. Close-up of a wooden stud in a kitchen wall, showing gaps and routing for wiring. Background features cabinets and tools, indicating ongoing renovation. Wall opening showing wooden studs with gaps and notches, exposing internal structure, questioning if the wall is load-bearing or not.
What do you think?
 
  • Like
multix
  • Laddar…
Not much suggests that it is load-bearing, but blueprints are much better than photos when assessing that! You need to be able to see the whole picture. Walls are part of the building's load-bearing system. I avoid judging whether they are load-bearing or not based on their appearance.
 
  • Like
multix and 2 others
  • Laddar…
J justusandersson said:
Not much suggests that it is load-bearing, but drawings are much better than photos when assessing this! You need to see the whole picture. Walls are part of the building's structural system. I avoid judging if they are load-bearing or not based on how they look.
Sounds wise. I'm not there right now to draw it to scale, but would the floor plan help somewhat? The wall in the picture is circled in the floor plan. If a more scaled drawing is needed, I'll get back to it :) The house is 1.5 stories with a gable roof from left to right and walls made of blåbetong. The entire living room is an extension, so it doesn't affect the original part of the house.

The bathroom has been expanded to the left, and the carpenter mentioned that wall was load-bearing, so they reinforced it with a glulam beam when it was moved.

Floor plan of a house with rooms labeled in Swedish. A wall in the kitchen is circled, relating to a structural discussion. The layout includes living room and bathroom.
 
  • Like
multix
  • Laddar…
Another realtor's drawing (sigh)! The circled wall can reasonably not be load-bearing, but it's impossible to understand the structural system based on the "drawing." If you want to know which walls are truly load-bearing, more information is required. One of the most important details is always the year of construction.
 
  • Like
anaitis and 1 other
  • Laddar…
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.