Hello

I'm asking you experts if it is OK to notch the floor joists 20mm and place them on the sill?

I have replaced the sill and cast the foundation wall a few cm to level it.

I am now thinking of placing a 195x45 sill. The floor joists have dimensions of 170x45.

To achieve the desired floor height, I need to notch the floor joists 20 mm before placing them on the sill. Is such an adjustment OK to make?

Is there perhaps another smarter way to attach the floor joists?
Maybe there are some types of joist hangers that work in such a case?

Thanks in advance :D
/beppe

PS.
I am attaching a picture showing how the floor joists meet the sill and foundation wall.
DS
 
  • Diagram showing floor joists meeting sill and foundation wall with labels for subfloor, wood pieces, and support structure.
Last edited:
  • Like
larsbj
  • Laddar…
It's all good, the bjälken holds up well anyway.
 
No, it is not appropriate to notch the beams on the underside of the ends, without other measures, as it weakens the wood. However, if you can place a ledger at 90 degrees against the sill, or some form of joist hanger, that the underside of the floor beam can rest against, it is OK.
 
J justusandersson said:
No, it is not appropriate to notch the beams at the ends' underside, without another measure, as it weakens the wood. However, if you can place a rule at 90 degrees to the sill, or some form of joist hanger, that the underside of the floor joist can rest against, it's OK.
A notch as small as 20 mm is no problem in a regular floor joist; a calculation of shear capacity suggests that approximately 70 mm is okay for a typical house floor joist with a span of 3.8 m.
 
If you only look at shear forces and torques (which are zero at the support), there are no problems. However, wood is not a homogeneous material. A notch on the underside constitutes a weakening and a potential crack initiation that should be avoided. On the other hand, it's fine to notch at the top side, but it's rarely a preference.
 
20mm is okay. But as mentioned, it constitutes a crack indication but not to the extent that it would cause any problems.
 
  • Like
joelmartinsson_jju and 1 other
  • Laddar…
According to the Eurocode, it is ok.
The calculation is for a notch in the underside of the beam.

Diagram illustrating a notch in a beam according to Eurocode, showing shear capacity reduction and relevant measurements labeled. Formula and explanation from Eurocode regarding beam underside notching, showing equations and symbols for calculations in structural timber or glulam.
 
  • Like
tobbbias and 1 other
  • Laddar…
I don't think it's a sustainable approach. If you don't have access to the eurokoderna, can't calculate the shear force, don't know what shear stress is, then it's a better rule of thumb to never notch the underside. Especially since it's always possible to arrange a proper support. The advice given on Byggahus must be simple and understandable.
 
That's probably why Ts is asking, and here they get the answer that it's okay, both experientially okay from a calculation standpoint.
 
No, TS does not get a real answer. A direct connection, as TS wishes to do, is not the same as the one described in the Eurocode. Additionally, we do not know the span, the load, and therefore whether 45x170 is a reasonable choice.
 
J justusandersson said:
45x170 is a reasonable choice
That wasn't what the OP asked.

Feel free to show with calculations that it wouldn't hold.
 
I am very grateful for all the input!

The room in question is 4.5 x 3.2 meters, so the span is not large, the entire beam will be 4.5 meters with a supporting beam at 2250 mm.

It doesn't feel like there should be any danger of structural integrity or that the construction will collapse, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
 
"i=1" for 90-degree urjack, also exists in eurocode
 
  • Like
larsbj
  • Laddar…
The latest data changes a lot. With an actual span of 2.25 m, 45x170 (if it is C 24) is an over-dimensioning. It's fine to notch 20 mm at 90 degrees because even 45x150 would handle the job.
 
S
J justusandersson said:
If you only look at shear forces and torque (which are zero at the support), there are no problems. But wood is not a homogeneous material. A notch on the underside constitutes a weakening and a potential fracture indication that should be avoided. However, it is fine to notch on the top side, but that is rarely desirable.
then many of our older houses should be ready for demolition
 
Click here to reply
Vi vill skicka notiser för ämnen du bevakar och händelser som berör dig.